Dampening force - find decrease in amplitude

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the damping force and its effect on amplitude in a damped harmonic oscillator. The user initially calculates the damping coefficient 'b' as 0.129378 using a specific equation. However, when applying this value to a different mass of 17.7 kg, the resulting amplitude is 50%, which is inconsistent with the expected 59.6%. The user highlights that the amplitude decreases to 45.4% of its initial value, indicating a discrepancy in the calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the damping formula to achieve accurate results.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
see attached
Relevant Equations
w=sqrt((k/m)-(b/(2m))^2)

Amplitude = (Amax)e^((-b/(2m)t)
So first I tried to find b.

0.454=(0.6)e^((-b/(2*11.6)*50)

Anyways with some natural log algebra etc. I get b = 0.129378

But when I plug this into the same equation only changing mass to 17.7 kg I get 0.4998 or 50% when the answer should be 59.6%?
 

Attachments

  • question.PNG
    question.PNG
    8 KB · Views: 150
Physics news on Phys.org
JoeyBob said:
Amplitude = (Amax)e^((-b/(2m)t)

0.454=(0.6)e^((-b/(2*11.6)*50)
The amplitude decreases to 45.4% of its initial value. So, the final amplitude is not .454
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
805
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
962
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K