- #1
jsmith613
- 614
- 0
There are two equations that can describe the time period of SHM oscillators (springs / pendulums ONLY)
Spring [itex]T = 2π * \sqrt \frac {m}{k}[/itex]
Pendulum [itex]T = 2π * \sqrt \frac {l}{g}[/itex]
It would seem from these equations that time period is independant of amplitude
therefore we should be able to conclude that the time period for a damped oscillator is the same as that for an undamped oscillator.
BUT if you oscillate something viscous (water, oil, tar) then then time period is massively increased.
My questions are
(a) would an underdamped system oscillate at the same period as an un-damped system?
(b) how come the equations of SHM and reality don't match up (damped systems are still undergoing SHM...I think)
(c) will the time period change in the damped system during the oscillations? i.e: could it start at 0.5s and then increas to 1s
Spring [itex]T = 2π * \sqrt \frac {m}{k}[/itex]
Pendulum [itex]T = 2π * \sqrt \frac {l}{g}[/itex]
It would seem from these equations that time period is independant of amplitude
therefore we should be able to conclude that the time period for a damped oscillator is the same as that for an undamped oscillator.
BUT if you oscillate something viscous (water, oil, tar) then then time period is massively increased.
My questions are
(a) would an underdamped system oscillate at the same period as an un-damped system?
(b) how come the equations of SHM and reality don't match up (damped systems are still undergoing SHM...I think)
(c) will the time period change in the damped system during the oscillations? i.e: could it start at 0.5s and then increas to 1s
Last edited: