Dark Matter Detection: Controversy Grows

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversy surrounding dark matter detection, particularly the annual modulation signature proposed for identifying dark matter particles in the galactic halo. A key concern is distinguishing between dark matter signals and potential variations in the gravitational constant (G), as suggested by Moffat. The paper referenced presents results over seven annual cycles, but questions remain regarding the interpretation of these findings. The possibility that spatial variations in G could mimic dark matter signatures complicates the detection efforts. This ongoing debate highlights the challenges in confirming the existence of dark matter amidst alternative theories.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The means of detection is given in the following quote from thatr paper:

"the model independent annual modulation signature for Dark Matter particles in the galactic halo"

They show results for seven annual cycles.

My question is how can we distinguish between Dark Matter and the variations of G (and no dark matter) proposed by Moffat. It seems that spatial variations in G would produce the same signature.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
50
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top