DC source rather than a clamper circuit?

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sami1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Dc Source
Sami1999
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Why is it preferred to use a clipper circuit rather than a DC source to shift an AC source upwards on a voltage-time graph?
Relevant Equations
No relevant equations
Why is it preferred to use a clamper circuit rather than a DC source to shift an AC source upwards on a voltage-time graph?Both require a battery(DC source) so isn't it cheaper than having to use some extra elements like capacitors and diodes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
Can you provide an image of the proposed clamper circuit?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can see that the circuit automatically adjusts its DC offset to follow the level of the signal.
 
I mean why not just place a battery in series with the source?
Shouldn't it have the same effect in the outcome.
 
Sami1999 said:
I mean why not just place a battery in series with the source?
Shouldn't it have the same effect in the outcome.
You may not have access to the signal source. A battery would add a fixed DC offset, whereas the clamping arrangement adjusts for varying signal levels so the offset is just enough so the offset signal doesn't go negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sami1999
Like @NascentOxygen said... and you would have to replace the battery on occasion. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sami1999

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K