- #1
turbo
Gold Member
- 3,165
- 56
Can you explain why an idea is so dangerous that it must be suppressed? Specifically the concept that the Pauli exclusion principle may be able to explain why the self-gravitation of the quantum vacuum has not yet collapsed the diameter of the universe to a few thousand kilometers (and may be in such fine dynamical balance with the gravitational-energy equivalence of the vacuum to keep the universe stable?)
I have come to expect the suppression of ideas in this forum, the tolerance of personally insulting posts (including name-calling and disparaging statements), and the offhand dismissal of non-mainstream ideas, no matter how compelling and logical. If Einstein, Dirac, or Feynman had posted in this venue, they would have been called names and their ideas would be vilified. I in no way wish to equate myself with these fine people, but wish to point out that each of them stood alone at some point and articulated a vision for the advancement of physics.
It would be instructive to all of us idiots who employ logic if you could list the "forbidden" subjects. Your call. Thanks
I have come to expect the suppression of ideas in this forum, the tolerance of personally insulting posts (including name-calling and disparaging statements), and the offhand dismissal of non-mainstream ideas, no matter how compelling and logical. If Einstein, Dirac, or Feynman had posted in this venue, they would have been called names and their ideas would be vilified. I in no way wish to equate myself with these fine people, but wish to point out that each of them stood alone at some point and articulated a vision for the advancement of physics.
It would be instructive to all of us idiots who employ logic if you could list the "forbidden" subjects. Your call. Thanks
Last edited: