Debunking the Claim of Negative Ions Improving Mood

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ions Negative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficacy of negative ion-producing machines in improving mood. Participants assert that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the claim that negative ions enhance happiness. They highlight that the perceived benefits may stem from the placebo effect rather than any actual physiological impact. Additionally, while these machines may slightly improve air quality by reducing dust and pollen, they are deemed largely ineffective and a poor investment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the placebo effect
  • Basic knowledge of air purification technologies
  • Familiarity with negative ions and their sources
  • Awareness of health implications related to air quality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific studies on the placebo effect
  • Explore the effectiveness of HEPA filters in air purifiers
  • Investigate the health impacts of indoor air quality
  • Learn about the history and marketing of negative ion generators
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for individuals interested in the science of air purification, health enthusiasts, and anyone evaluating the claims surrounding negative ion technology and its impact on well-being.

maximus
Messages
495
Reaction score
4
my mother recently bought a negative ion producing machine, claiming that negative ions have the ability to make her feel happier. is there any way i can scientifically debunk this claim? links would be good.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Ask her to sit closer to the TV. The electron gun in the TV provides far more "happy" negative charged particles and at a much lower cost than any specialist machine. (Hmm... maybe that's why TV = happiness?)

Ok, seriously, don't do the above. The radiation from the TV may in fact be bad for the health. As for the ioniser, I don't think there is much evidence. The best I can think of it is that charged dust particles in the air may clump and settle down more, making the air somewhat cleaner. Still sounds like waste of money to me.

Hey, most of the happiness comes from the placebo effect. Because she thinks she will feel happy, she does feel happy. Perhaps in this case it is not really necessary to break this by debunking it, and you can't exactly take it back, can you? Up to you though.
 
Originally posted by FZ+
Perhaps in this case it is not really necessary to break this by debunking it, and you can't exactly take it back, can you? Up to you though.

actually she encourages me to. (and there's a 60 day return limit, so she's safe there)
 
Uhm, I know (or think I know) what your talking about. I've always seen them advertised as low power consuming air filter device things. The purpose of it is to do as FZ said, but some actually use hepa filter looking things to catch the dust and pollen and such.

I imagine that if you lived in a dusty or high pollen count environment, such a device could provide some happiness, so long as it truly cleans the air.

But I don't think the negative ions have anything to do with triggering happines. If this were the case, it seems the whole world would be incredibly happy. If nothing else, I would point out to her that negative ions are all over the place, tv, probably natural occurances or big power stations, and that the world, for the most part, is miserable.
 
actually, most of what iv read has said that the negative ion producing machine things don't do jack ****. It apparently was a huge fad in japan. It might clean the air out a bit, but it won't do anything other than that. WASTE OF MONEY!

BTW tell your mom to stop watching late-night/early-morning infomercials :).
 
Originally posted by FZ+
The radiation from the TV may in fact be bad for the health.

If this was true, there would be a whole fad about 'ion friendly' tvs.
 
Having a house where the air is cleaned of dust and pollen would certainly make me happier - especially now hayfever season is kicking in. :)
 
Originally posted by plus
If this was true, there would be a whole fad about 'ion friendly' tvs.
I think they did have them once, with layers of shielding around tvs, back projector screens etc etc...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
30K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
24K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K