Debye Model Q&A: Interpreting Expression & Link to Einstein's

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter guy bar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Debye Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the Debye model's expression for averaged energy, specifically ⟨E⟩=3∑→kℏω(→k) [nB(βℏω(→k))+12], and its analogy to Einstein's expression ⟨E⟩=∑kℏω [nB(βℏω)+12]. The user seeks clarification on the derivation of Debye's expression from a partition function and the relationship between the two models. It is established that the Debye model serves as a correction to the Einstein model by accounting for varying frequencies of oscillation among phonons, rather than assuming uniform frequency across all ions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with the concepts of phonons and their role in solid-state physics
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, particularly partition functions
  • Basic grasp of the Debye and Einstein models in solid-state theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Debye model from statistical mechanics principles
  • Examine the role of partition functions in quantum statistical mechanics
  • Explore the differences between the Debye and Einstein models in detail
  • Review Kittel's "Introduction to Solid State Physics" for insights on phonon behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in solid-state physics, particularly those focusing on thermal properties and phonon interactions, as well as educators teaching concepts related to the Debye and Einstein models.

guy bar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have trouble understanding some ideas relating to the Debye model.

In my text (Oxford Solid State Basics by Steven Simon, page 11), it was stated that Debye wrote the following expression
⟨E⟩=3∑→kℏω(→k) [nB(βℏω(→k))+12]
What was not stated was the meaning of this expression. The only mention was that it was completely analogous to Einstein's expression for the averaged energy of a quantum harmonic oscillator in 1D.
⟨E⟩=∑kℏω [nB(βℏω)+12]
However, I can't seem to draw the link between the 2 expressions. Could someone explain to me
1) the interpretation of Debye's expression
2) how Debye's expression arises from a partition function (and how the partition function comes about),
3) and also the link between the 2 equations?

Many thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The derivation of both model is nicely carried out in Zimann's book "principles of theory of solid" (I think in chapter 2). Although I don't really recognize the formulae you wrote...

This should answer question 1 and 2. About your question 3, if I remember correctly Einstein model was derived assuming all ions vibrate at the same frequency. You can think of the Debye model as a "correction" of the Einstein model which introduces a "wight" for different frequencies of oscillations (phonons).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K