Deceleration of an object due to friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to push a 1 kg object over a distance of 200 meters on a surface with a friction coefficient of 0.4. Participants are exploring the relationship between force, friction, and motion, particularly in the context of kinematics and work.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the force needed by using kinematic equations and frictional force. Some participants question the relevance of kinematic equations in this context, suggesting a focus on work and friction instead. Others seek clarification on how to determine the force required for a single push versus a constant push.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the forces at play and the distinction between static and kinetic friction. There is a recognition that the original approach may not align with the problem's requirements, and guidance has been offered regarding the necessary force to overcome static friction.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster is new to physics, which may influence their understanding of the concepts being discussed. The conversation also touches on the distinction between a one-time push and a continuous force application.

keyofdoor
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With how much force do I have to push a 1 kg object so that it goes 200 meters over a surface with a friction coefficient of 0.4?

Homework Equations


Kinematic Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I listed the variables I knew off the bat
mass = 1 kg
distance = 200 meters
friction coefficient = 0.4
gravity = 9.82

I found a frictional force of 3.928 (therefore a deceleration of 3.928)

Using the equation :

V_f ^2 = V_i ^2 + 2ad
I put in :
0 = V_i ^2 + 2(-3.928)* 200
and by basic algebra:
V_i = 39.638...

And therefore you would need 39.638 Newtons of force to push a 1 kg object 200 meters with a friction coefficient of 0.4
I would like to know if this is correct and if not why am I wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You found velocity, not a force.

Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't this be work?
 
Last edited:
Lamebert said:
You found velocity, not a force.
Can you detail on how I find the force needed?
 
keyofdoor said:
Can you detail on how I find the force needed?

I'm not really sure, actually. I can find the work needed to move it 200 meters, which is just the frictional force times distance. If you want to push it over those 200 meters, at a constant speed, you can use 3.92N of force over the 200 meters, but I don't think a minimal amount of force applied to move it over a distance is a valid question.

I don't think kinematics equations are relevant if the only forces causing motion are friction and the push force.
 
Sorry, I needed to clarify more,
If I only give it one push, without touching it ever again. Not a constant push.
(I'm very new to physics so I'm going to make a lot of mistakes.)
 
keyofdoor said:
Sorry, I needed to clarify more,
If I only give it one push, without touching it ever again. Not a constant push.
(I'm very new to physics so I'm going to make a lot of mistakes.)

Even so, the force is still applied over some distance.

I'd just wait until someone who is more intelligent than I am to come in. It seems like a really simple problem, just as far as I know this would make more sense as a work problem.
 
You only need enough force to overcome static friction. Assuming it's a horizontal push, that's μsmg, your 3.928N. You appear to then divide that by the mass again to obtain 3.928ms-2, which you termed a 'deceleration'. I suppose you could consider it a deceleration in this sense: if there were no friction and you applied a horizontal force F then the acceleration would be a = F/m; the friction reduces that by 3.928ms-2.
But the answer to your question is just 3.928N. To cover 200m you just have to keep applying that force (or perhaps less if kinetic friction is lower).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I'm pretty sure that's the answer, so thank you. Sorry for confusing you Lamebert.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K