Deceleration of rocks sliding up a hill

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 2K views
jamiebean
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
attached below
Relevant Equations
kinetic coefficient x normal force= kinetic energy
螢幕截圖 2020-05-22 下午7.38.43.png


i have no idea how did the answer come in conclusion...i guess that cosθ and sinθ is referring to the 2 dimensions of the acceleration ? but how? and why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jamiebean said:
Homework Statement:: attached below
Relevant Equations:: kinetic coefficient x normal force= kinetic energy

i guess that cosθ and sinθ is referring to the 2 dimensions of the acceleration ?
Yes. Do as they suggest and draw a FBD. That will help you to resolve the components.

BTW, I think the answer given is wrong -- it has a sign error, no?
 
There are two terms to the acceleration because there are two separate forces opposing its uphill motion. What are these two forces?

Edit: Rats! @berkeman beat me to it.
 
berkeman said:
BTW, I think the answer given is wrong -- it has a sign error, no?
Unless by "base" they mean the top of the hill? That would usually be referred to as the "top" or "crest" of the hill, not the "base", IMO... Is there a diagram that goes with this problem?
 
berkeman said:
Unless by "base" they mean the top of the hill? That would usually be referred to as the "top" or "crest" of the hill, not the "base", IMO... Is there a diagram that goes with this problem?
One one hand, the question does not specify whether the positive direction is uphill or downhill so the number for the acceleration can have either sign. On the other hand, the question may have adopted the convention that "positive" means "in the direction of the velocity" which means the number must be negative. The question would have no ambiguity if it asked for the magnitude or if it specified which way is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman