Hello ! I am currently investigating a technique that would allow several spark gaps to breakdown synchronously in an enclosed but not hermetical cavity, flushed with N2 at 1atm and ~25°C My idea was to use "indirect" photoionization (basically a synthetic fused quartz UV flash discharge inside the cavity) The cavity would be enclosed with a highly reflective material to UV from 160nm to the near UV. However, ionization of the outer electron shell of N2 seems to be at ~15eV, and at 160nm we are nowhere close to this photon energy level. So, i was wondering if any indirect effect (N2 excitation, thermal effects ?) would eventually "help" to lower the dielectric strength with that method. Keep in mind that the flash lamp would send a burst of 100 to 200 J of light... Or is it a dead end ? I could always ionize the surroundings with a spark gap trigger not enclosed in a flash lamp, but it is a bit too dirty (because of the "brutal" thermal/accoustic shockwave influence on the secondary spark gaps) Anyone could shed a bit of light on this issue ? ;) - i would rather not change the dielectric gas because i am afraid of unintended consequences (ozone generation for O2, fire hazards, etc) Thx.