MHB Definite integral involving the natural log function

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the definite integral ∫ from 1 to e of (3dx)/(x(1+ln(x)²)). A substitution of u = ln(x) is recommended to simplify the integral, changing the limits accordingly. This leads to the integral transforming into a form involving arctan, specifically 3∫ from 0 to 1 of (1/(u²+1)) du, which evaluates to 3tan⁻¹(u) from 0 to 1. Additionally, there is clarification on the difference between arctan (tan⁻¹) and cotangent, emphasizing that cotangent is the multiplicative inverse of tangent, not its functional inverse. The discussion highlights common misconceptions in notation and function definitions.
bmanmcfly
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I figured I would just add this new problem over here, rather than starting a new thread.

Im looking to solve integration leading to arctan or arcsin results.

[math]\int_{1}^{e}\frac{3dx}{x(1+\ln(x)^2})[/math]

Looking at this, it feels like this has an arctan in the result, but I would have to multiply the x with the [math](1+\ln(x)^2)[/math] and then would figure out a difference of squares to figure out the integral...

that ln(x) is what is screwing me up...

So, I guess I'm asking how working with the ln(x)^2 would be different from working with just an x.

Side question, what is the difference really between [math]tan^{-1}, Cot and arctan[/math] it seems to me that these are just different ways of saying cos/sin. Is there something else significant that I'm ignorant about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We actually prefer that you begin a new topic for a new question rather than tag a new question onto an existing topic, as per rule #8. I have split the topic so that your new question has its own topic. :D

For this definite integral, I recommend using the substitution:

$$u=\ln(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

Now, being mindful to change the limits in accordance with the substitution, how may you now rewrite the integral?
 
MarkFL said:
We actually prefer that you begin a new topic for a new question rather than tag a new question onto an existing topic, as per rule #8. I have split the topic so that your new question has its own topic. :D

For this definite integral, I recommend using the substitution:

$$u=\ln(x)\,\therefore\,du=\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

Now, being mindful to change the limits in accordance with the substitution, how may you now rewrite the integral?
Woops, I was thinking it would keep things more streamline... Not important.

As for the integral,

Thanks for the pointer, the limits would change to ln(e)- ln(1) or 1-0.
let me know if I got you right...
[math]3\int_{\ln(1)}^{\ln(e)}\frac{(\frac{1}{u}du)}{(1+u^2)}[/math]

This gives [math]3\tan^{-1}(u)|_{\ln(1)}^{\ln(e)}
[/math]

Thanks again so much, you don't even know.
 
You've got the right idea...I would think of the integral as:

$$\int_1^e\frac{3}{x(1+\ln^2(x))}\,dx=3\int_1^e \frac{1}{\ln^2(x)+1}\cdot\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

Now, when you make the substitution, you may write:

$$3\int_0^1\frac{1}{u^2+1}\,du=3\left[\tan^{-1}(u) \right]_0^1$$
 
MarkFL said:
You've got the right idea...I would think of the integral as:

$$\int_1^e\frac{3}{x(1+\ln^2(x))}\,dx=3\int_1^e \frac{1}{\ln^2(x)+1}\cdot\frac{1}{x}\,dx$$

Now, when you make the substitution, you may write:

$$3\int_0^1\frac{1}{u^2+1}\,du=3\left[\tan^{-1}(u) \right]_0^1$$

Now, the other part of the question;

Is there any significant difference between [math]\tan^{-1} , \cot, \and \arctan [/math]??It seems that all mean the same thing? What's the reason to use one over the other? Cause to me it seems just preference.
 
Well, we do have:

$$\arctan(x)\equiv\tan^{-1}(x)$$

However, the cotangent function is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent funtion, not the functional inverse, and this is a common misconception among students.

$$\cot(\theta)\equiv\frac{1}{\tan(x)}$$

whereas if:

$$x=\tan(\theta)$$ then $$\theta=\tan^{-1}(x)$$

usually defined where $$-\frac{\pi}{2}<\theta<\frac{\pi}{2}$$.

It can be a confusing notation, where for variables, we take:

$$x^{-1}=\frac{1}{x}$$

but for functions:

$$f^{-1}(x)\ne\frac{1}{f(x)}$$

and by definition:

$$f^{-1}\left(f(x) \right)=x$$
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K