Definite trigonometric integral using properties

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the definite integral of secant functions, specifically the expression ## I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x dx##, with a focus on finding ## I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##. Participants explore various methods to approach the problem, including reduction formulas and properties of indefinite integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider using reduction formulas but express interest in alternative methods suggested by textbooks. Some attempt to find specific values like ##I_2## and ##I_4## to identify patterns, while others discuss the tedious nature of the integration process. There are inquiries about evaluating integrals of even powers of secant and the potential for simpler methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and insights. Some have provided guidance on using substitution and the binomial theorem, while others express uncertainty about the efficiency of their methods. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of integrating higher powers of secant and the limitations of their current knowledge regarding the binomial theorem, which may affect their ability to simplify the problem further.

Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


If ## I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x dx## then find ## I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##

2. The attempt at a solution
this should be solvable by reduction formulae but since it'd be longer I wanted to know if there was a way to do it using mostly properties of indefinite integrals as suggested by my textbook. I'd appreciate the help, thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Krushnaraj Pandya said:

Homework Statement


If ## I_n = \int_0^\frac {\pi}{4} \sec^n x dx## then find ## I_{10} - \frac {8}{9} I_8##

2. The attempt at a solution
this should be solvable by reduction formulae but since it'd be longer I wanted to know if there was a way to do it using mostly properties of indefinite integrals as suggested by my textbook. I'd appreciate the help, thank you
I would start by finding ##I_2## and ##I_4## to see if I can deduce a pattern.
 
Mark44 said:
I would start by finding ##I_2## and ##I_4## to see if I can deduce a pattern.
I2 is tanx which evaluates to 1. I4 is tanx+(tanx^3) which is 4/3; I went further ahead to calculate I6 too, I guess the integration isn't very hard since you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime but I didn't see a pattern in the final-integrated functions
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I2 is tanx which evaluates to 1. I4 is tanx+(tanx^3) which is 4/3; I went further ahead to calculate I6 too, I guess the integration isn't very hard since you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime but I didn't see a pattern in the final-integrated functions
I got the correct answer but the process was quite tedious
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I got the correct answer but the process was quite tedious

Welcome to calculus (especially integration). Sometimes solutions are lengthy, and there is no way of shortening them. Of course, sometimes the opposite is true, IF some clever insights are used---not always, however.
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
you just have to substitute tanx as t everytime

If that's true, can you evaluate ##\int sec^{2k} x dx##?

(There's a Youtube video about developing a reduction formula for ##\int \sec^n x dx##. It writes ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)##. Then it uses integration by parts followed by using the identity ##\tan^2x = \sec^2x -1##. However, the presenter remarks "The integrals of even powers of secant are easy". So the person who posed your problem may have a simpler method in mind.)
 
Ray Vickson said:
Welcome to calculus (especially integration). Sometimes solutions are lengthy, and there is no way of shortening them. Of course, sometimes the opposite is true, IF some clever insights are used---not always, however.
hahaha, well I'm here to learn to get those intuitions at the end of the day I guess. (otherwise you could probably integrate anything by a long string of algorithmic substitutions etc)
 
Stephen Tashi said:
If that's true, can you evaluate ##\int sec^{2k} x dx##?

(There's a Youtube video about developing a reduction formula for ##\int \sec^n x dx##. It writes ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)##. Then it uses integration by parts followed by using the identity ##\tan^2x = \sec^2x -1##. However, the presenter remarks "The integrals of even powers of secant are easy". So the person who posed your problem may have a simpler method in mind.)
I can develop the reduction formula myself (but that'd still be lengthy if for example this question was in my entrance exams for a grad school- I'd never have the time to do it), but what I did was just write ##\sec^n x## as ##(\sec^{n-2} x)( \sec^2 x)## then directly put tanx=t instead of by parts (as done in the video). So I ended up having to solve ## (1 + t^2 )^4 ## for ##I_{10}## and then integrating the polynomial obtained. The same, just with power 3 for ##I_8##. There probably isn't anything quicker than this but I'm not sure (for example- what'd we do if we had sec^22, can't keep multiplying 1+t^2 20 times)
 
Use the binomial theorem.
 
  • #10
vela said:
Use the binomial theorem.
I'm afraid that's two chapters ahead...so I only know the basics of binomial theorem till now- as in I can expand (1+x)^k etc., not sure how I can use it here
 
  • #11
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
There probably isn't anything quicker than this but I'm not sure (for example- what'd we do if we had sec^22, can't keep multiplying 1+t^2 20 times)
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
I'm afraid that's two chapters ahead...so I only know the basics of binomial theorem till now- as in I can expand (1+x)^k etc., not sure how I can use it here
That's the form of ##(1+t^2)^{20}##, is it not?
 
  • #12
vela said:
That's the form of ##(1+t^2)^{20}##, is it not?
oh, right sorry! how silly of me. Thank you, that's a really good way to evaluate higher powers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K