this is a rather stupid question regarding preliminaries for the definition of boundaries(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

the question is whether every closed n-1 dim. closed submanifold [itex]C[/itex] of an arbitrary n-dim. manifold defines a volume [itex]V[/itex]; i.e. whether [itex]\partial V = C[/itex] can be turned around such that V is defined as the "interior" of [itex]C[/itex] (instead of defining the boundary [itex]\partial V[/itex] in terms of V)

my observation was that this seems to fail for the torus [itex]T^2[/itex] and a closed loop [itex]\gamma[/itex] on [itex]T^2[/itex] if [itex]\gamma[/itex] has a non-trivial winding number, i.e. if the winding number [itex]w(\gamma) \neq (0,0)[/itex]; a loop with [itex](1,0)[/itex] does not define an "interior" on the torus (the interior is the whole torus) and therefore seems not to be the boundary of a volume (the torus itself has no boundary);

so my question is which conditions for a closed manifold must hold such that it can be used as a boundary of a volume in the sense of integration of differential firms and stokes theorem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Definition of boundary, Stokes' theorem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**