Definition of the dressed propagator

hellfire
Science Advisor
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
In section 7.3 of Ryder's "Quantum Field Theory", the "complete" or "dressed" propagator is defined to be the two-point function to all orders of the perturbation expansion. It is denoted in (7.71) as G_c^{(2)}(x, y). It changes the bare mass to the physical mass. My question is, why aren't contributions from other n-point functions considered for this definition? For example, the 4-point function contains also disconnected graphs that modify the propagator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should they be? Both for a free and an interacting theory the propagator is the 2 point function by definition (connected or disconnected it doesn't matter, since there are only 2 spacetime points).

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
connected or disconnected it doesn't matter, since there are only 2 spacetime points.
Thanks, this makes sense. I was somehow confused, but your comment answers exactly my question.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top