Degeneracy pressure and interactions

In summary, the electromagnetic force is often responsible for the manifestation of pressure in most situations, such as atmospheric pressure. However, degeneracy pressure is not due to the electromagnetic force and is more complicated. In neutron stars, degeneracy pressure is responsible for supporting the matter and is communicated through collisions between neutrons. This pressure is a result of the Pauli exclusion principle and sets a limit on how much matter can be squeezed together before collapsing into a neutron star or black hole.
  • #1
relativityfan
75
0
hi,
I wonder if the electromagnetic force is the force that expresses how pressure interacts.
I mean, a pressure is a force divided by a surface. is that force the electromagnetic force, that would be the consequence of an increased kinetic energy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends on the type of pressure, but in most situations: yes. Things like atmospheric pressure are generally manifest through EM interactions.

Degeneracy pressure, however, is not due to EM force; its a little more complicated.
 
  • #3
but how is the degeneracy communicated in a neutron star. I mean, if there is that pressure, does it generate collisions to other neutrons? in such collisions, what is the force involved?
 
  • #4
I understand the exclusion principle or the uncertainty principle are involved. but then, after that, which force communicates the pressure from one neutron to another neutron?
 
  • #5
dont know about neutrons but

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle#Stability_of_matter
The stability of the electrons in an atom itself is not related to the exclusion principle, but is described by the quantum theory of the atom. The underlying idea is that close approach of an electron to the nucleus of the atom necessarily increases its kinetic energy, an application of the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg.[3] However, stability of large systems with many electrons and many nuclei is a different matter, and requires the Pauli exclusion principle.[4]

It has been shown that the Pauli exclusion principle is responsible for the fact that ordinary bulk matter is stable and occupies volume. This suggestion was first made in 1931 by Paul Ehrenfest, who pointed out that the electrons of each atom cannot all fall into the lowest-energy orbital and must occupy successively larger shells. Atoms therefore occupy a volume and cannot be squeezed too closely together.[5]

A more rigorous proof was provided in 1967 by Freeman Dyson and Andrew Lenard, who considered the balance of attractive (electron-nuclear) and repulsive (electron-electron and nuclear-nuclear) forces and showed that ordinary matter would collapse and occupy a much smaller volume without the Pauli principle.[6] The consequence of the Pauli principle here is that electrons of the same spin are kept apart by a repulsive exchange interaction, which is a short-range effect complemented by the long-range electrostatic or coulombic force. This effect is therefore partly responsible for the everyday observation in the macroscopic world that two solid objects cannot be in the same place in the same time.

However, Dyson and Lenard did not consider the extreme magnetic or gravitational forces which occur in some astronomical objects. In 1995, Elliott Lieb and coworkers showed that the Pauli principle still leads to stability in intense magnetic fields such as in neutron stars, although at a much higher density than in ordinary matter.[7] It is a consequence of General Relativity that in sufficiently intense gravitational fields, matter collapses to form a black hole.
 
  • #6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle#Astrophysics_and_the_Pauli_principle
Astronomy provides another spectacular demonstration of this effect (the Pauli_exclusion_principle), in the form of white dwarf stars and neutron stars. For both bodies, the usual atomic structure is disrupted by large gravitational forces, leaving the constituents supported by "degeneracy pressure" alone. This exotic form of matter is known as degenerate matter. In white dwarfs, atoms are held apart by electron degeneracy pressure. In neutron stars, which exhibit even more intense gravitational forces, electrons have merged with protons to form neutrons. Neutrons are capable of producing an even higher degeneracy pressure, albeit over a shorter range.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_degeneracy_pressure
Electron degeneracy pressure is a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that two fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state at the same time. The force provided by this pressure sets a limit on the extent to which matter can be squeezed together without it collapsing into a neutron star or black hole. It is an important factor in stellar physics because it is responsible for the existence of white dwarfs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_matter#Neutron_degeneracy
 
  • #7
relativityfan said:
but how is the degeneracy communicated in a neutron star. I mean, if there is that pressure, does it generate collisions to other neutrons? in such collisions, what is the force involved?
An effect of degeneracy pressure is to raise the energy of the neutrons, so yes---it does cause more collisions (which occur via coulomb and strong interactions). Degeneracy pressure itself is a purely quantum-mechanical/statistical effect, its not 'communicated' via any of the fundamental forces.
 
  • #8
Wiki is a convenient, but, unreliable resource - my 2c.
 

1. What is degeneracy pressure?

Degeneracy pressure is a quantum mechanical effect that occurs in a dense system of particles, such as atoms, electrons, or neutrons. It is a result of the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two identical fermions (particles with half-integer spin) can occupy the same quantum state at the same time. This leads to a repulsive force between particles compressed to very high densities, which counteracts the force of gravity and provides structural support.

2. How does degeneracy pressure affect stars?

In stars, degeneracy pressure is responsible for preventing gravitational collapse. As a star's core runs out of fuel and can no longer produce enough energy to support its own weight, gravity causes it to collapse. However, as the core reaches a high enough density, degeneracy pressure kicks in and stops the collapse, maintaining the star's stability and preventing it from becoming a black hole.

3. What is the difference between electron degeneracy pressure and neutron degeneracy pressure?

Electron degeneracy pressure occurs in stars that are supported by the pressure of electrons, such as white dwarfs. In these stars, the electrons are highly compressed and can no longer occupy the same quantum states, leading to the repulsive force of degeneracy pressure. Neutron degeneracy pressure, on the other hand, occurs in stars that are supported by the pressure of neutrons, such as neutron stars. In these stars, the neutrons are compressed to such a high density that they also obey the Pauli exclusion principle and produce degeneracy pressure.

4. How does degeneracy pressure contribute to the stability of white dwarfs?

White dwarfs are supported by electron degeneracy pressure. As the star's core runs out of fuel and it begins to collapse, the electrons in the core become highly compressed and generate a strong repulsive force that counteracts the force of gravity. This leads to a stable equilibrium, with the degeneracy pressure providing the necessary support to prevent further collapse.

5. Can degeneracy pressure be observed in everyday life?

Yes, degeneracy pressure can be observed in everyday life in certain materials. For example, in some metals, such as copper, the outermost electrons are highly compressed and exhibit degeneracy pressure. This results in the material being very hard and resistant to compression. Additionally, degeneracy pressure can be observed in the formation of white dwarfs, neutron stars, and other highly dense objects in the universe.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
4
Replies
109
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
126
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
972
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top