Deliberate riseball (dimple) from a baseball pitch

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuckspnz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baseball Pitch
AI Thread Summary
It is theoretically impossible for a baseball to rise to a near vertical position during a pitch due to the laws of physics, but the perception of a "rising fastball" is created by the Magnus effect, which results from backspin. This effect causes the ball to fall less rapidly than expected, leading to an optical illusion for the batter. While a human cannot throw a baseball fast enough to achieve actual rise, certain lighter balls, like a wiffle ball, may exhibit more pronounced rising effects. Techniques such as gripping the ball with four seams and throwing with strong backspin can create a flatter trajectory, enhancing the illusion of rise. Overall, the discussion highlights the interplay between physics and perception in baseball pitching.
chuckspnz
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to pitch a ball as a fastball (e.g. like in baseball) and have the ball rise to a near vertical and then fall back down to the ground. The ball would obviously have an altered design/features to cause it to lift/rise, but just wondering whether that sounds like something that could work. Apologies if this question makes no sense and completely defies the laws of physics, I am definitely not an expert rather a curious mind. I was recently at a beach throwing seashells into the water, and I noticed a few shells that I had tossed ended up flying to amazing heights when thrown at a horizontal. Wanted to know if the same could be done with something spherical.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fastball
Fastballs are usually thrown with backspin, so that the Magnus effect creates an upward force on the ball. This causes it to fall less rapidly than expected, and sometimes causes an optical illusion often called a rising fastball. Although it is impossible for a human to throw a baseball fast enough and with enough backspin for the ball to actually rise, to the batter the pitch seems to rise due to the unexpected lack of natural drop on the pitch.
 
  • Like
Likes chuckspnz
Maybe not a baseball, but a whiffle ball, maybe? See 4:07 of this video.
 
  • Like
Likes chuckspnz
Makes sense, thanks everyone
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Back in high school, we had a new baseball coach come to our school when I was a freshman. He taught us how to pull the ball out of our glove holding 4 seams (takes practice, but becomes instinctive after a while), and how to throw the ball with strong backspin as infielders and outfielders. From the outfield, that makes the ball appear to rise for a bit, and then fall more slowly on the way to the target.

I understand now that it is a bit of an optical illusion that it rises at first, but for sure it makes the ball's path much flatter for throws across the infield or from the outfield to the infield.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top