Density of states for fermions and bosons

hokhani
Messages
555
Reaction score
16
To take into account the density of states for an ideal gas, we first calculate it ignoring the spin. Then to take into account the spin for a system of electrons we put the number 2 for two spin directions. Why don't we do such this for a boson gas? For example if we have a gas of spin 1 particles, why don't we put the number 3 to consider three spin directions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is Pauli exclusion principle. Spin 1 particles(bosons) do not care about it, i.e., when you interchange two bosons their wavefunction stays the same(symmertic). Fermions, on the other hand, respect the principle, i.e., have antisymmetric wavefunction, so you need that factor of two to account for all possible states.
 
samalkhaiat said:
The answer is Pauli exclusion principle. Spin 1 particles(bosons) do not care about it, i.e., when you interchange two bosons their wavefunction stays the same(symmertic). Fermions, on the other hand, respect the principle, i.e., have antisymmetric wavefunction, so you need that factor of two to account for all possible states.
Thanks, but I don't agree. We are indeed calculating the number of states accessible to a particle.Therefore for a particle with spin 1, each single level turns into three different states.
 
Yes, I completely misunderstood your question! In general, if you have g states with the same energy E, then the number of non-interacting, identical particles with energy e is given by
n_{ i } = g_{ i } D (e_{ i } , T )
where D is Bose or Fermi distribution function.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top