Derivation of Black Hole Entropy: Hawking & Beckenstein's Arguments

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the derivation of black hole entropy, specifically exploring the arguments presented by Hawking and Bekenstein regarding the proportionality of black hole entropy to surface area. Participants seek resources and calculations to deepen their understanding of this concept within the context of theoretical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to understand the derivation of black hole entropy and requests resources for the calculation.
  • Another participant provides a link to Bekenstein's original 1973 paper, suggesting it contains a good discussion of the topic.
  • A different participant recommends Jacobson's notes and a significant paper by Wald for additional perspectives on black hole entropy.
  • One participant thanks others for the shared links, indicating they find the resources helpful.
  • Another participant shares a link to a paper by Bardeen, Carter, and Hawking, contributing to the discussion of black hole entropy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relevance of the shared resources for understanding black hole entropy, but there is no explicit consensus on a singular approach or derivation method.

Contextual Notes

The discussion relies on the assumption that participants have a foundational understanding of relativity and quantum field theory, which may influence the interpretation of the provided resources.

quickAndLucky
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
I am looking to walk trough hawking and beckenstien's arguments for the proportionality of bh entropy to surface area to better understand black hole entropy. Does anybody know where I can find this calculation? I have taken relativity and qft so I am comfortable with this level of difficulty.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks guys these links are great!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K