Derivation of Box-Muller Transform: Exponential Distrib.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rabbed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transform
rabbed
Messages
241
Reaction score
3
In derivation of the box-muller transform, the joint distribution p(x,y) = e^(-r^2/2)/(2*pi) is interpreted as the product of a uniform distribution 1/(2*pi) and an exponential distribution e^(-x/2), but isn't an exponential distribution defined as k*e^(-k*x)? What happened to the coefficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing a constant.
 
derivation: Start with \frac{1}{2\pi}e^{\frac{-x^2-y^2}{2}}dxdy. Change to polar coordinates. \frac{1}{2\pi}e^{\frac{-r^2}{2}}<br /> rdrd\theta. For you picture s=r^2,\ so\ ds=2rdr,\ or\ rdr=\frac{ds}{2}. There's the coefficient.
 
Thanks mathman :)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top