Derivation of Law of Refraction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the law of refraction, specifically Snell's Law, expressed as n = sinI/sinR, where n is the refractive index, I is the angle of incidence, and R is the angle of refraction. Participants explore the reasoning behind the use of sine functions rather than direct angle ratios and seek clarification on the necessary trigonometric manipulations involved in the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the law of refraction uses sinI/sinR instead of a direct ratio of angles, indicating a need for trigonometric manipulation.
  • Another participant suggests that the law can be derived from Fermat's principle or Hamilton's principle, emphasizing the importance of the velocity component parallel to the surface.
  • A participant references a classic analogy involving running and swimming to illustrate the concept of least time, which leads to the same result as Snell's Law.
  • One participant shares links to external resources that helped them understand the geometric proof of Snell's Law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation methods, with some proposing Fermat's principle while others reference geometric approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific trigonometric manipulations needed.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully detailed the assumptions or definitions underlying their claims, and there are unresolved mathematical steps related to the derivation of Snell's Law.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

I have learned that the law of refraction is n = sinI/sinR, where n is the refractive index, I is the angle of incidence, and R is the angle of refraction.

But why is it sinI/sinR, and not simply angle I/angle R if it is identifying the ratio between the two angles?

I have heard that I need to do some trigonometric manipulation but I don't know what this manipulation is. Thanks.

(i.e. if I = 60 degrees, and R = 30 degrees, then the refractive index is sqrt(3), not 2... but why? how was this law derived?)
 
Science news on Phys.org
You can derive it from Fermat's principle (least time), or from hamilton's principle. The key is that it only depends on the component of velocity parallel to the surface.
There is also the old, 'running along the sand--swimming across the river' in the least time example which gives you the same result.
 
Hello;

Apologies for the delay between replies; I have no internet access so I have to wander around the street looking for hotspots. Thanks for the link - it helped me formulate a way to geometrically show why Snell's Law is true. I also found this, which helped too: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/316/lectures/node128.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K