Derivation of length contraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of length contraction in special relativity, specifically addressing the measurement of a scale's length in both rest and moving frames. The participants clarify that to accurately measure length, one must consider three events: two events for one end of the rod and one event for the other end, ensuring that the measurements are simultaneous in one frame while non-simultaneous in another. The confusion arises from treating the ends of the rod as single events rather than as worldlines, leading to incorrect conclusions about length measurements. The correct application of Lorentz transformations is emphasized to derive the relationship between lengths in different frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, including Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with the concept of simultaneity in different reference frames
  • Knowledge of worldlines and spacetime intervals
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations involving γ (gamma) factor
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Learn about simultaneity and its implications in different inertial frames
  • Explore the concept of worldlines and how they relate to events in spacetime
  • Investigate practical applications of length contraction in physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on special relativity, as well as researchers interested in the implications of length contraction in theoretical and experimental physics.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53
Problem : To measure length of a scale
Rest frame : The frame w.r.t. which scale is at rest
Moving frame : The frame w.r.t. which the scale is moving with speed v along +ve x-axis

In rest frame ,the positions of the two ends of the scale are (measured simultaneously ) x1 and x2. So length L = x2 -x1
and t1 =t2=t

In moving frame,
the positions of the two ends of the scale are (measured simultaneously ) x'1 and x'2. So length L' = x'2 -x'1
and t'1 =t'2=t

Now,
x'2 -x'1 = γ ( x2 -x1 - v(t2 - t1) )
⇒ L' = γ L as t2 = t1

and

x2 -x1 = γ ( x'2 -x'1 - v(t'2 - t'1) )
⇒ L= γ L' as t'2 = t'1

What is wrong here?
I am asking this as I often do this mistake.

I think,

What I am doing here is I am measuring (x2 ,x1),and (x'2 ,x'1) simultaneously.
So, I am having four events.

What I should do:
I am supposed to have only two events for measuring the length and these two events should be such that these are simultaneous in the moving frame while non - simultaneous in the rest frame. Let's denote the two events as A and B.
Now, the coordinates of A and B are in rest frame [(t2,x2 ),(t1,x1)] respectively and the coordinates of A and B are in moving frame [(t'2,x'2),(t'1,x'1)] respectively and t'1 =t'2
Now,
x'2 -x'1 = γ ( x2 -x1 - v(t2 - t1) )
Now, expressing t2 and t1in prime coordinates using Lorentz transformation and doing further calculation gives L= γ L'
and
x2 -x1 = γ ( x'2 -x'1 - v(t'2 - t'1) )
⇒ L= γ L' as t'2 = t'1

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pushoam said:
What is wrong here?
I think that the main problem is that you are thinking of the ends of the rod as two events, but they are two worldlines. So you should be thinking of transforming the worldlines rather than transforming events.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis, vanhees71 and Pushoam
Pushoam said:
I am supposed to have only two events for measuring the length and these two events should be such that these are simultaneous in the moving frame while non - simultaneous in the rest frame. Let's denote the two events as A and B.
No, you are supposed to have two pairs of events. As Dale has already pointed out, you have two worldlines - one for each end of the rod.

To do your length measurements, you need three events: A, which is somewhere on the worldine of one end of the rod, and B and C which are events on the worldline of the other end. B and C are chosen so that A and C are simultaneous in one frame and A and B are simultaneous in the other. Now A and B give us the position of both ends of the rod at the same time in one frame, and A and C give us the position of both ends at the same time in the other frame.
 
lc1.png
lc2.png
lc2.png


The book is considering only two events.
How to apply the concept of three events?
 
Pushoam said:
Now,
x'2 -x'1 = γ ( x2 -x1 - v(t2 - t1) )
⇒ L' = γ L as t2 = t1
This is the error x'2-x'1 is not L' when t2 = t1. Because then t'2 <> t'1 so the measuring of the end positions in S' is not at the same time and that's not a correct length measurement.
 
Pushoam said:
The book is considering only two events.

What is your description of those two events?
 
Pushoam said:
The book is considering only two events.
How to apply the concept of three events?
Look at what they were doing when they said "Now as measured in ##S ## these same two point events have ##x## coordinates equal to ##x_1## and ##x_2##, respectively, independent of the time as measured in ##S##." They are taking advantage of the fact that in the rest frame, and only the rest frame, you can skip the "at the same time" constraint.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam
Consider equating two spacetime intervals for S and S' , A and B
A at rest at x1
B moving to right at v from x0 to x1 l = x1 - x0
From A the time between events is l/v and l = 0
From B the time between events is l0/v and distance = l0
So l2/v2 = lo 2 /v2 - lo2
l = lo √1-v2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
908
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K