Derivation of Lorentz transformation (time)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the Lorentz transformation for time, specifically the equation t = δ(t' + vx'/c²). Participants explore various approaches to isolate and solve for t using the relationships between the coordinates x, x', t, and t' in the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to derive the equation t = δ(t' + vx'/c²) but struggles with the simplification process.
  • Another participant suggests finding a linear combination of x' and t' that does not involve x, recommending the use of units where c = 1.
  • A participant notes that many derivations, including those found on Wikipedia, reach a similar point but do not clarify how to arrive at the standard formula.
  • Another participant proposes rewriting γ² - 1 in a specific way to facilitate the derivation.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the use of the symbol δ instead of γ, later realizing the mistake after clarification from others.
  • A later reply provides a detailed calculation that leads to the conclusion t = γ(vx' + t'), using a specific manipulation of the equations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to derive the Lorentz transformation, but there are differing opinions on the specific steps and manipulations required to reach the final equation. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of a singular, clear path to the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the assumptions made in their derivations, particularly concerning the use of symbols and the manipulation of equations. There are also unresolved mathematical steps that participants are working through.

rem45
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm trying to derive that t=δ(t'+vx'/c^2)

Using x'=δ(x-vt) then substituting for x=δ(x'+vt') I should be able to isolate t and solve the problem but I am getting to the following point after simplification and can't figure out where to go next...?

x'= δ[δ(x'+vt')-vt] (isolate "vt")

vt = -x'/δ + δ(x'+vt') (divide by "v")

t = -x'/δv + (δ/v)(x'+vt')
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're trying to solve the system of equations
\begin{align}
&t'=\gamma(-vx/c^2+t)\\
&x'=\gamma(x-vt)
\end{align} for t, it's really weird to use the result for x in terms of t' and x', because that's no easier to find than the result for t.

I recommend that you start by finding a linear combination of x' and t' that doesn't involve x. (I would also use units such that c=1, to avoid having to keep track of factors of c in every step, but that's optional).
 
I agree but the assumption is that I do not know the equation for t or t', only x and x'. I see this approach on numerous websites including the wikipedia derivation but everyone seems to get to where I am the just write that this becomes the familiar t=(gamma)(t'+vx'/c^2)
 
OK, in that case, the trick is to rewrite ##\gamma^2-1## in a clever way. Can you see it? Use the definition of ##\gamma##.
$$t=-\frac{x'}{\gamma v}+\frac{\gamma}{v}(x'+vt') =\frac{x'}{\gamma v}(\gamma^2-1)+\gamma t'.$$
 
Yes, it took me min but now I see it! Very sneaky. I don't see how this becomes t=δ(t'+vx'/c^2)...

Apparently δ(vx'/c^2) = [x'/δ(v)](δ^2-1) but there must be some other trick to reduce to the standard formula
 
Not sure why there's an x' in your result for ##\gamma^2-1##, but you can cancel it from that equation. Then solve for ##\gamma^2-1##, and insert the result into the right-hand side of the calculation in post #4.

Why are you using the symbol δ instead of γ. Is it just because the latter looks too much like a y?

Edit: OK, now I see what you're doing. The reason you didn't solve for ##\gamma^2-1## is that you wanted to rewrite the first term on the right-hand side in post #4. You found that it's equal to ##\gamma v x'/c^2##. This turns the result in post #4 into
$$t=\frac{\gamma v x'}{c^2}+\gamma t' =\gamma\left(t'+\frac{vx'}{c^2}\right).$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Got it! Sorry i didn't have my reading glasses with me but now i can see now that I've been using delta instead of gamma.

Thanks for your help!
 
OK, cool. I think the easiest way to do this calculation is like this (in units such that c=1):

\begin{align}
&x'=\gamma(x-vt) =\gamma\big(\gamma(x'+vt')-vt\big) =\gamma^2(x'+vt')-\gamma vt\\
&\gamma vt =\gamma^2(x'+vt')-x' =(\gamma^2-1)x'+\gamma^2vt'\\
&\hspace{20mm}\bigg[\gamma^2-1=\frac{1}{1-v^2}-1 =\frac{1-(1-v^2)}{1-v^2}=\gamma^2v^2\bigg]\\
&\gamma vt =\gamma^2v^2x'+\gamma^2vt'\\
&t=\gamma v x'+\gamma t' =\gamma(vx'+t')
\end{align}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K