Derivation of partitioning of total variability

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcguiry03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
mcguiry03
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
it is a sum of squares in anova(analysis of data). how can i derive this equation?tnx..
 

Attachments

  • anova.jpg
    anova.jpg
    6.3 KB · Views: 447
Physics news on Phys.org
-\bar{Y}_{i.} + \bar{Y}_{i.} = 0

So you can place that anywhere and you change nothing, it is a common trick.
 
viraltux said:
-\bar{Y}_{i.} + \bar{Y}_{i.} = 0

So you can place that anywhere and you change nothing, it is a common trick.
what is my working equation so i can arrive at the sum of squares identity?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top