Derivation of relativistic motion equations from action

lmcelroy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Anyone willing to derive the motion equations of special relativity from the SR action:

S = -m0c2t1t21/γ dt
where:
m0 = rest mass
γ = Lorentz factor =1/√(1-v2/c2)
v is the velocity as a function of time.

The full action contains terms of the vector potential and scalar potential but assume that these are negligible. I think that is all the information required. Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've decided to use units where c=1 for simplicity. Also note that v^2=\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}, where \vec{v} is the three-velocity. \vec{x} is the three-position (x,y,z), and \vec{p} is the relativistic three-momentum.Varying the action gives:

\delta S= - \int \delta (m \sqrt{1-v^2}) dt=0

Simplifying:

-\int \delta (m \sqrt{1-\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}}) dt= - \int \frac{m \vec{v}\cdot \delta \vec{v}}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}dt

If you integrate by parts, the integrated term will be dotted with δx, so it goes to zero when evaluated at the boundaries. What you're left with is:

\int \frac{d}{dt} \left ( \frac{m \vec{v}}{\sqrt{1-v^2}} \right ) \cdot \delta \vec{x}~dt=0

The integrand, as you can see, is the time derivative of the relativistic momentum. For δS to be zero identically, this must be zero. So we're done:

\frac{d}{dt} \left ( \frac{m \vec{v}}{\sqrt{1-v^2}} \right )= \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}=0This tells us that objects will move inertially. Had you chosen to include the vector and scalar potentials, you would have ended up with:

\frac{d}{dt} \left ( \frac{m \vec{v}}{\sqrt{1-v^2}} \right )= q(\vec{E}+\vec{v}\times \vec{B})

Where:

\vec{E}=-(\nabla \phi +\frac{\partial \vec{A}}{\partial t})
\vec{B}= \nabla \times \vec{A}

with \phi and \vec{A} as the scalar and vector potential respectively.
 
Also, an easier way to go about things might be the following:

We're supposed to extremize S = -m∫L(x,v,t)dt = -m∫(1/γ) dt. We can just plug this Lagrangian into the Euler-Lagrange equation. A trick to make this easier is to realize that if a Lagrangian L satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation, then in general any function of the Lagrangian f(L) also satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation as long as ∂/∂λ (∂f/∂L)=0, where λ is your parameter (I can't think of an example where this wouldn't be the case, but I included it just to be safe). The reason is simple:

If:

∂L/∂q = ∂/∂λ (∂L/∂(∂q/∂λ))

, then by chain rule we get that:

∂f/∂q = (∂f/∂L)(∂L/∂q) = (∂f/∂L)(∂/∂λ)(∂L/∂(∂q/∂λ)) = ∂/∂λ (∂f/∂(∂q/∂λ))So, instead of using L(x,v,t) = 1/γ, we can use f(L) = L2 = γ-2 = (1-v2):\frac{\partial }{\partial \vec{x}}[1-\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}]=0

and

\frac{\partial }{\partial t} \frac{\partial }{\partial \vec{v}}[1-\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}]=\frac{\partial }{\partial t}[-2\vec{v}]=-2\frac{\partial \vec{v}}{\partial t}

So we find that:

\frac{\partial \vec{v}}{\partial t}=0.

This is equivalent to what I did in my last post. They both say that objects will move inertially (not accelerate).
One more thing to point out is that dt/γ = dτ, where τ is proper time. This means that the action S = -m∫dτ = -mΔτ. So extremizing the action is equivalent to extremizing the proper time elapsed. Some call this the principle of extremal proper time, and it generalizes nicely to general relativity. Geodesics can be found in this way, by extremizing ∫gμν(dxμ/dλ)(dxν/dλ)dλ.
 
Last edited:
^Thanks for that. An easy to follow derivation and explanation even for someone new to the calculus of variations, as myself.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top