Derivative? f(x) = ln(3-e^(-x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter JSS6151
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function f(x) = ln(3 - e^(-x)). Participants are exploring the application of differentiation rules, particularly the chain rule, in the context of logarithmic and exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the confusion between the product rule and the chain rule, with some attempting to clarify their understanding of function notation and differentiation techniques. Questions arise about the correct application of these rules and the proper notation for functions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the differentiation process, with some participants providing guidance on function composition and the application of the chain rule. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being discussed, and participants are actively questioning their assumptions and notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that they are learning multiple differentiation rules simultaneously, which may contribute to confusion. There are also concerns about accuracy in their homework assignments.

JSS6151
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
we're learning about the product rule and i understand it in class but I'm having a really hard time not making mistakes in my work, plus the ln is throwing me off...my homework is for accuracy too :frown: PLEASE help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem requires using the chain rule, not the product rile.

What have you tried?

Where are you stuck?
 
JSS6151 said:
we're learning about the product rule and i understand it in class but I'm having a really hard time not making mistakes in my work, plus the ln is throwing me off...my homework is for accuracy too :frown: PLEASE help!
The product rule doesn't apply in this problem, but the chain rule does.
 
Welcome to PF!

The chain rule will be necessary here. If it helps, think of it as doing multiple substitutions so that:

u(x) = 3-e-x

f(u) = ln(u)

Then the chain rule says:

[tex]\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{df}{du}\frac{du}{dx}[/tex]
 
my mistake. we're learning about chain, product, and quotient rule all at once so i got confused.

our professor was teaching us to separate the problem into two pieces, so i know to make it something like

f(x) = ln(z) and f(z)=3-e^(-x))

then the derivative of f(x) would be 1/z and you'd plug in f(z) into that but i don't know the derivative of f(z) and I'm not even sure if what I've posted so far is correct!
 
Don't use the same letter for two different functions. That's a surefire way to get confused. And don't write f(x) when your function actually involves z, and vice-versa.

f(z) = ln(z)
g(x) = 3 - e-x
 
JSS6151 said:
f(x) = ln(z) and f(z)=3-e^(-x))

Your notation here doesn't really make sense. If something is a function of x, then it should depend on x. If something is a function of z, then it should depend on z. Also, you should use different symbols for the "inside" and "outside" functions. To see how to express the composition of functions properly, see my post above.

As for how to differentiate 3-e-x, just apply the rules. The derivative of a sum is the sum of the derivatives, so that:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(3-e^{-x}) = \frac{d}{dx}(3) - \frac{d}{dx} (e^{-x})[/tex]

Now, to differentiate the exponential, you can apply the chain rule once again:

e-x = eg(x)

where g(x) = -1x

and the chain rule says:


[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(e^{g(x)}) = \frac{d}{dg}(e^{g(x)})\frac{dg(x)}{dx}[/tex]
 
thanks for the advice
so if f(z) = lz(z) and g(x)=3-e^-x

f'(z) = 1/z right? because derivative of ln x = 1/x.

and g'(x) = 3-(-1)e^x because derivative of e^x = e^x

not sure about that last line i wrote...
and then i would plug the answer for g'(x) into the 1/z in place of z?
 
JSS6151 said:
thanks for the advice
so if f(z) = lz(z) and g(x)=3-e^-x

f'(z) = 1/z right? because derivative of ln x = 1/x.
Ignoring the typo "lz(z)", yes.
JSS6151 said:
and g'(x) = 3-(-1)e^x because derivative of e^x = e^x
No. The derivative of a constant is 0, so you should get g'(x) = +e-x. Note the minus sign on the exponent.
JSS6151 said:
not sure about that last line i wrote...
and then i would plug the answer for g'(x) into the 1/z in place of z?

You have f(z) = ln(z), and u = g(x) = 3 - e-x
For d/dx(f(g(x)) = d/dx(f(u)), you should get f'(u)*u'(x)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K