Derivative of g(h(t), t) with respect to h

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jstock23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivative of a function defined as g(h(t), t) with respect to h, exploring the implications of the chain rule and the relationships between the variables involved. Participants examine the complexities of taking derivatives when one variable is dependent on another, particularly in the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to take the derivative of g with respect to h when h is a function of t, suggesting the use of the chain rule.
  • Another participant proposes a formula involving partial derivatives and attempts to calculate dg/dt, arriving at a specific expression.
  • A participant expresses confusion about applying the chain rule due to the dependent nature of h on t, questioning the validity of holding t constant while differentiating with respect to h.
  • Further exploration is suggested by considering g(h,t) as a surface in the (h,t) plane, analyzing the relationship between h and t along a specific path.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and differing interpretations regarding the application of the chain rule and the implications of variable dependence. No consensus is reached on the correct approach to the derivative.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in understanding due to the interdependence of variables and the nuances of applying derivatives in the context of classical mechanics.

jstock23
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Yoooooooooooo,

How would the derivative of a function with respect to another function work?

For example:

h(t) = t^2
g(h,t) = ht = t^3

dg/dh = (d/dh)ht

What I think:

maybe
dg/dh = t

chain rule
dg/dt = (dg/dh)(dh/dt) + dt/dt
then solve for dg/dh

or maybe
dg/dt = (dg/dh)(dh/dt)
then solve for dg/dh

or maybe
dg/dt = (dh/dt)t + (dt/dt)h
so it's impossible

Having some trouble deciding. Thx a bunch, I've been having a huge problem with this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try
[tex]\frac {dg}{dt} = \frac{\partial g}{\partial h} \frac{dh}{dt} + \frac{\partial g}{\partial t} \frac{dt}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]= (t)(2t) + (h)(1) = 2t^2 + (t^2)(1) = 3t^2[/tex]

Having said that, when I read books on classical mechanics where the derivatives are denoted with dots, it always looks like they aren't following that rule exactly.
 
Ooh, I messed up the chain rule hehe

How can you take a partial derivative with respect to h, holding t constant, while this implies that h will also be constant, as it is a function of t?

I trust what you said, and the chain rule, it still just isn't that convincing because of the dependent nature of h.

Thx again
 
jstock23 said:
I trust what you said, and the chain rule, it still just isn't that convincing because of the dependent nature of h.

Maybe that's the same trouble I have when I read those classical mechanics books!

I think the way to derive that formula involves considering g(h,t) to be a surface over the (h,t) plane. Then consider a path defined by formula (t^2,t) that passes through a point (h,t). Let dg/dt be the rate of change in g as seen by someone moving along that path. Being on the path introduces a relation between h and t. The path has a direction and a speed (with respect to a change in t). As I recall, analyzing all that (which is usually done in terms of vectors) gives the formula.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
I think the way to derive that formula involves considering g(h,t) to be a surface over the (h,t) plane.

cool, that spatial example made it all make sense hehe :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
35K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K