Derivative of the Gamma Function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivative of the gamma function, exploring various approaches to its calculation and implications. Participants examine the mathematical formulation, the use of differentiation under the integral sign, and the relationship to related functions such as the digamma function.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the gamma function as an integral and attempts to differentiate it under the integral sign, leading to the expression for its derivative involving a logarithmic term.
  • Another participant confirms the derivative expression but notes its complexity and introduces the digamma function as a related concept.
  • There is a discussion about the convergence of the integral form of the gamma function, particularly for negative values of x, which raises questions about the applicability of the derivative in those cases.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the existence of an analytical derivative for the gamma function, suggesting it may be non-analytical.
  • Another participant questions whether other non-analytical functions could possess an analytical derivative, indicating a broader inquiry into the nature of such functions.
  • A later post introduces the error function and its derivative as an example of a function with an analytical derivative, contrasting it with the gamma function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the form of the derivative of the gamma function, but there is no consensus on its implications, particularly regarding its analytical properties and the convergence of related integrals. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of analytical derivatives for non-analytical functions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the convergence of the integral for the gamma function and the potential restrictions when considering negative values of x. The discussion also highlights the complexity of expressing the derivative in simpler forms.

Unit
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
A very vague question:

What is the derivative of the gamma function?
Here's what I've got, using differentiation under the integral. Can anybody tell me if I'm on the right track? What does my answer mean?

\Gamma(z) = \int_0^{\infty} t^{z - 1} \: e^{-t} \; dt

The integrand can be expressed as a function f(z, t) = t^{z - 1} \: e^{-t}:

\frac{d}{dz} \int_{y_0}^{y_1} f(z, t) \; dt = \int_{y_0}^{y_1} \frac{\partial}{\partial z} f(z, t) \; dt

Because e^{-t} is a constant of sorts (correct me if I'm wrong), with respect to the partial derivative to z, all this turns into

\frac{d}{dz} \Gamma(z) = \int_0^{\infty} t^{z-1} \: e^{-t} \: \ln(t) \; dt

But this is useless! Does anybody have any thoughts?

(I'm trying to find all the extrema of the gamma function, ... they look like the follow an exponential curve and I want to see if there is an expression for it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unit said:
\frac{d}{dz} \Gamma(z) = \int_0^{\infty} t^{z-1} \: e^{-t} \: \ln(t) \; dt

But this is useless!

nevertheless correct. \Gamma' cannot be written in simpler ways. You often see \Psi(x) = \Gamma'(x)/\Gamma(x) called the digamma function.

(I'm trying to find all the extrema of the gamma function, ... they look like the follow an exponential curve and I want to see if there is an expression for it)

These extrema are for negative x, right? But the integral form converges only for positive x, so it is of no use in this.
 
Yeah, although it would be cool if THIS non-analytical function could have an analytical derivative... alas... :'(
 
wait, n1person, are you hinting that there exist OTHER non-analytical functions that could have an analytical derivative?

p.s. thank you both for your replies :smile:
 
Derivative of the Gamma Function...


Unit said:
What is the derivative of the gamma function?

Derivative to the gamma function according to Mathematica 6:
\frac{d}{dz} \Gamma(z) = \Gamma(z) \cdot \psi^{(m)}(z)} = \left( \int_0^\infty t^{z-1} e^{-t} \, dt \right) \left( \int_0^{\infty}\left(\frac{e^{-t}}{t} - \frac{e^{-zt}}{1 - e^{-t}}\right) \, dt \right) \; \; \; m = 0

\boxed{\frac{d}{dz} \Gamma(z) = \left( \int_0^\infty t^{z-1} e^{-t} \, dt \right) \left( \int_0^{\infty}\left(\frac{e^{-t}}{t} - \frac{e^{-zt}}{1 - e^{-t}}\right) \, dt \right) \; \; \; m = 0}

\Gamma(z) - Gamma function
\psi^{(m)}(z) - Polygamma function
The m^th derivative of the digamma function.
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digamma_function"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamma_function"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well any function that is used to define an anti-derivative/integral of an analytical function would have an analytical derivative, right?
<br /> \operatorname{erf}(x) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_0^x e^{-t^2} dt.<br />

so the derivative of error function;

<br /> \frac{\rm d}{{\rm d}x}\,\mathrm{erf}(x)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\,e^{-x^2}.<br />
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K