Derive an expression for the radial charge distribution of an E field

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for the radial charge distribution from the electric field. Participants confirm the cancellation of certain terms in the del equation due to the unidirectional nature of the electric field. This leads to the simplified equation for the divergence of the electric field. The application of Gauss's law is discussed, specifically isolating the charge density, ρ(r), to derive an expression. The final result obtained is ρ(r) = 2E₀ε₀/r, which is validated by other participants.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
Consider a spherical distribution of charge that creates a uniform, radial electric field described by: ##\vec{E}=E_o\hat{r}##

Use the differential form of Gauss's Law to derive an expression for the radial charge distribution, ##\rho##, that will create this field. You will need the divergence in spherical coordinates: ##\nabla \cdot \vec{V}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\theta}}(\sin[{\theta}]V_{\theta})+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\phi}}(V_{\phi})##
Enter your mathematical expression for ρ(r) in terms of ##\epsilon_o, E_o ##, and ##r##
Relevant Equations
$$\nabla \cdot \vec{V}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\theta}}(\sin[{\theta}]V_{\theta})+\frac{1}{r\sin[{\theta}]}\frac{\partial}{\partial{\phi}}(V_{\phi}) $$
I know we're supposed to attempt a solution but I'm honestly super confused here. I think the second an third terms of the del equation can be cancelled out because there is only an E field in the r hat direction, so no e field in the theta and phi directions. That leaves us with ##\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 E_r)##. The question says to write an expression for ##\rho (r)##. I know gauss' law has the differential form of itself equaling ##\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}##. would you isolate ##\rho## to get an expression for ##\rho (r)##? Thanks for your help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jaccobtw said:
I think the second an third terms of the del equation can be cancelled out because there is only an E field in the r hat direction, so no e field in the theta and phi directions.
Yes.

Jaccobtw said:
That leaves us with ##\nabla \cdot \vec{E}=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{\partial}{\partial{r}}(r^2 V_r)##.
The symbol ##V_r## on the right side would be better written as ##E_r##.

Jaccobtw said:
The question says to write an expression for ##\rho (r)##. I know gauss' law has the differential form of itself equaling ##\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}##. would you isolate ##\rho## to get an expression for ##\rho (r)##?
Yes. See what you get.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Jaccobtw
TSny said:
Yes.The symbol ##V_r## on the right side would be better written as ##E_r##.Yes. See what you get.
Thank you. I got ##\frac{2 E_o \epsilon_o}{r}##
 
Jaccobtw said:
Thank you. I got ##\frac{2 E_o \epsilon_o}{r}##
Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Jaccobtw
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
990
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K