Finding Total Charge from E-field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a static charge distribution characterized by a radial electric field described by the equation E = αe^(-λr)/r, where λ and α are positive constants. Participants are tasked with calculating the total charge of this distribution using principles from electromagnetism, particularly Gauss's law and charge density calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to calculate the total charge, including using Gauss's law and evaluating the divergence of the electric field to find charge density. There are discussions about the implications of limits as radius approaches infinity and the behavior of the electric field at large distances.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the setup of integrals and the implications of the results. Some suggest that the total charge could be zero based on the behavior of the charge density, while others are clarifying the mathematical steps involved in the calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the charge density appears to change sign at a specific radius, leading to questions about the divergence of the integral and the necessity of considering the entire distribution extending to infinity. There are also concerns regarding the correct setup of integrals and the interpretation of limits in the context of the problem.

Marcus95
Messages
50
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A static charge distribution has a radial electric field of magnitude
##E = \alpha \frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r} ##
where λ and α are positive constants. Calculate the total charge of the distribution.

Homework Equations


Gauss's law ##Q/\epsilon_0 = \int \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{S}##
##\rho/\epsilon_0 = \nabla \cdot \vec{E} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried two ways to go about this problem, without success. First I tried using Gauss's law, placing a Gaussian sphere of radius a on the distribution:
##Q/\epsilon_0 = \int \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{S} = 4\pi\alpha (ae^{-\lambda a}) ##
We should now find the total charge by letting ## a \rightarrow \infty ##, but ##\lim_{a \rightarrow \infty} ae^{-\lambda a} = 0##, giving ##Q = 0## which i thought cannot be right.*

My second method involved finding the charge distribution
##\rho/\epsilon_0 = \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \alpha \frac{e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r)}{r^2} ## but this gives an integral which is divergent!

*I have done some further thinking and realized that ##Q_{tot} = 0## might be the answer, because the charge density changes sign at ##r = 1/\lambda## so the total net charge could as well be zero.

However, how is it possible that the volume integral of #\rho# is divergent then? Or is it not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcus95 said:
My second method involved finding the charge distribution
##\rho/\epsilon_0 = \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \alpha \frac{e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r)}{r^2} ## but this gives an integral which is divergent!
Make sure you are setting up the integral correctly. Are you using the correct form for the volume element of the integral?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Marcus95 and Charles Link
Isn't E = k Q / R^2 (spherical charge distribution)?
Then 2 E R dR = k dQ.
The integral doesn't diverge unless (1 / R) appears in the result at R = 0.
 
J Hann said:
Isn't E = k Q / R^2 (spherical charge distribution)?
Yes.
Then 2 E R dR = k dQ.
This doesn't look right. From E = k Q / R2 you have k Q = R2 E. If you take the differential of this, you need to note that E is a function of R.

But I don't see the point of doing this. kQ = R2E already tells you how much charge is contained in a sphere of radius R. So, taking the limit as R goes to infinity will give you the total charge of the system. This is essentially what @Marcus95 did in his first method of finding Qtot.
 
TSny said:
Yes.
This doesn't look right. From E = k Q / R2 you have k Q = R2 E. If you take the differential of this, you need to note that E is a function of R.

But I don't see the point of doing this. kQ = R2E already tells you how much charge is contained in a sphere of radius R. So, taking the limit as R goes to infinity will give you the total charge of the system. This is essentially what @Marcus95 did in his first method of finding Qtot.

I tend to agree, but why does R need to go to infinity?
Was this implied in the problem?
 
Also, doesn't L'Hopital's give a finite value for E as R goes to infinity?
(It does appear to be zero)
 
J Hann said:
I tend to agree, but why does R need to go to infinity?
Was this implied in the problem?
The charge density extends to infinity. So, to get the total charge you have to include all the charge out to infinity.
 
J Hann said:
Also, doesn't L'Hopital's give a finite value for E as R goes to infinity?
(It does appear to be zero)

##E = \alpha \frac{e^{-\lambda r}}{r} ##

L'Hopital gives zero for the limit, but you don't really need L'Hopital. The numerator goes to zero while the denominator goes to infinity as ##r## goes to infinity.
 
TSny said:
Make sure you are setting up the integral correctly. Are you using the correct form for the volume element of the integral?
My integral is:
##Q = \int_{r=0}^\infty \int_{\theta=0}^{\pi} \int_{\phi=0}^{2\pi} \alpha\epsilon_0 \frac{e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r)}{r^2} \times r^2sin\theta d\theta dr d\phi ##
which gives:
##Q = 4\phi \alpha \epsilon_0 \int_{r=0}^\infty e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r) dr =4\phi \alpha \epsilon_0 [re^{-\lambda r}]_0^\infty = 0 ##
so it all works out! Thanks a lot!
 
  • #10
Marcus95 said:
My integral is:
##Q = \int_{r=0}^\infty \int_{\theta=0}^{\pi} \int_{\phi=0}^{2\pi} \alpha\epsilon_0 \frac{e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r)}{r^2} \times r^2sin\theta d\theta dr d\phi ##
which gives:
##Q = 4\phi \alpha \epsilon_0 \int_{r=0}^\infty e^{-\lambda r}(1-\lambda r) dr =4\phi \alpha \epsilon_0 [re^{-\lambda r}]_0^\infty = 0 ##
so it all works out! Thanks a lot!
OK. In the second equation, the ##\phi## should be ##\pi##??

Otherwise, looks good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K