Derive Cattaneo–Vernotte Law w/Proof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mohammed El-Kady
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cattaneo–Vernotte law, which addresses heat conduction, requires a rigorous mathematical derivation to establish its validity. The discussion highlights the inadequacy of the proof provided on Wikipedia, indicating that it lacks comprehensive justification. Participants emphasize the need for a detailed examination of the law's assumptions and implications, particularly in the context of non-Fourier heat conduction models. The consensus is that a formal proof is essential for a complete understanding of the law's application in thermodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with heat conduction theories
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs
  • Experience with non-Fourier heat conduction models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of the Cattaneo–Vernotte law
  • Study non-Fourier heat conduction models in detail
  • Explore advanced thermodynamics textbooks for comprehensive proofs
  • Examine peer-reviewed articles on heat conduction and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers specializing in thermodynamics, particularly those focused on heat conduction and its mathematical modeling.

mohammed El-Kady
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
derivation of the law
I need to know the derivation of Cattaneo–Vernotte law. "if it has a proof"
 
Science news on Phys.org
Wikipedia has some motivation. It does not seem to be a proof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K