Hi, everyone:)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In my mechanics book a derivation is given for acceleration in rotating reference frames. However, there is one step I don't understand.

First of all, it is derived that [tex]v=v'+\omega\times r'[/tex] or [tex]\left( \frac{dr}{dt}\right) _{fixed}=\left( \frac{dr'}{dt}\right) _{rot}+\omega\times r'[/tex]

The unprimed vectors are relative to the fixed reference frame and the primed vectors to the rotating one. Then it is claimed that this should hold for any vector:

[tex]\left( \frac{dQ}{dt}\right) _{fixed}=\left( \frac{dQ}{dt}\right) _{rot}+\omega\times Q[/tex]

In particular, it holds for the velocity vector:

[tex]\left( \frac{dv}{dt}\right) _{fixed}=\left( \frac{dv}{dt}\right) _{rot}+\omega\times v[/tex]

In this equation v can be substituted as [tex]v=v'+\omega\times r'[/tex] and then, after some algebraic manipulation, one can find the fictitious forces.

What i dont understand is why the primes are suddenly being dropped. Why are vectors relative to the rotating reference frame suddenly being replaced by ones relative to the fixed frame.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Deriving acceleration in rotating reference frames

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**