Deriving an Expression of an Object in Free-Fall on Mars

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the velocity expression for an object in free fall on Mars, factoring in drag forces. The drag force is defined using the drag coefficient, reference area, and Martian air density, leading to an equation of motion that incorporates these variables. A substitution method is employed to transform the equation into a function of time, resulting in a velocity expression dependent on mass and radius. However, a problem arises when attempting to determine the constant C, as it yields a non-real value under specific conditions. The participants suggest that the integration may be flawed due to assumptions about the independence of mass and other variables, indicating that both mass and radius should be treated as functions of time.
lithium123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I'm trying to derive an expression of the velocity of an object in free fall on Mars, and I am having trouble. Here is what I've done so far:

Drag on Mars can be expressed as
$$F_d = \frac{C_d A \rho_M v^2}{2}, $$ where C_d denotes the drag coefficient, A the reference area, and rho_M the air density on Mars. Let $$k = \frac{C_d A \rho_M}{2}$$.

Suppose the lander is in free-fall. Considering its two main forces, the lander hence has an equation of motion
\begin{align*}
F_d - mg &= m \hspace{1mm}\frac{dv}{dt} \\
\frac{k}{m}v^2 - g &= \frac{dv}{dt} \\
\int {dt} &= \int{\frac{dv}{\frac{k}{m}v^2 - g}}
\end{align*}
Applying the substitution $$v = u \sqrt{\strut\frac{gm}{k}}$$, the equation can then be written as

\begin{align*}
t &= \int \frac{1}{\left(u^2-1\right)\sqrt{\frac{gk}{m}}} du \\
&= -{\sqrt{\frac{m}{gk}}}\int \frac{1}{-u^2+1} \hspace{1mm} du \\
&= -{\sqrt{\frac{m}{gk}}} \hspace{1mm} \text{arctanh} \hspace{1mm} u
\end{align*}
And substituting back, $$u = v \sqrt{\strut\frac{gm}{k}}$$ and expressing this as a function $v(t)$ gives us $$v(t) = \sqrt{\frac{gm}{k}} \hspace{1mm} \text{tanh} \hspace{1mm} ( \hspace{0.5mm}\sqrt{\frac{gk}{m}} (C-t)).$$ Now, we must find the values of the constants in our above expression.

From information about our object, we have $$ k = \big(\frac{1}{2}\big) (0.67)(\pi r^2)(0.0155) \approx 0.0163 r^2 \hspace{1mm} \frac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}}.$$
The force of $g$ on Mars is expressed as $$g = 3.711 \frac{\text {m}}{\text{s}^2}.$$
Note m and r are not constants and vary. Our velocity expression can then be written as $$v(m,t,r) = \frac{15.083}{r} \sqrt m \hspace{1mm}\text{ tanh} \hspace{1mm}\frac{0.285211r (C-t)}{\sqrt m}.$$ We can determine the constant C by noting that our object has a mass of 600 kg, begins the landing phase at $t = 0$ at a speed of 250 m/s with a cross sectional area of 81pi, or $$v(600, 0, 9) = 250$$.

I have run into a problem here. If I use v(600, 0, 9) = 250, the C value turns out to not be real. Why is this, and is it still possible to get an expression for v(m,t,r) with this special condition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @lithium123:

I don't think I can offer much help, but I think the integration of
t = ∫... du is flawed. You assumed that m is independent of u, and I don't think that is correct. Both m and u are functions of t.

If I am wrong about this, I apologize.

ADDED

I am not sure why you said
Note m and r are not constants and vary.​
m might vary if some fuel is used to control attitude while falling.
I think you intended r to be ρ.

In any case, gk/m is a function of t, so the integral with respect to t should have an integrand of
√m/gk

Regards,
Buzz
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes lithium123
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
547
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K