Deriving Balloon Shrinkage: A Diffusion Problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the diffusion of helium through a rubber balloon wall, leading to the balloon's shrinkage. Participants are tasked with deriving an equation that relates the balloon's size to time and estimating the time required for the balloon to shrink to a specified diameter. The conversation includes elements of mathematical reasoning, conceptual clarification, and technical explanation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about starting the problem and considers incorporating mass balance with flux equations.
  • Another participant calculates the initial number of moles of helium using the ideal gas law and finds the initial concentration in the balloon.
  • There is a discussion about determining the concentration of helium outside the balloon and whether to assume the pressure outside is 1 atm.
  • One participant suggests that the partial pressure of helium outside the balloon would be 0 atm, questioning the logic of boundary conditions.
  • Participants discuss Henry's law and its application to find the concentration of helium in the rubber at the interface.
  • There are attempts to derive equations relating the volume and surface area of the balloon as it shrinks, with some participants suggesting different approaches to integrate these terms.
  • Confusion arises regarding the volume calculation, with one participant correcting another's misunderstanding of the radius and diameter relationship.
  • Participants explore the implications of assuming the rubber is incompressible and how that affects the mass balance equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on several points, including the correct application of Henry's law, the assumptions regarding external pressure, and the integration of volume and surface area terms. There are multiple competing views and ongoing clarifications throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions needed for the problem, such as the pressure conditions outside the balloon and the treatment of the rubber material properties. There are also unresolved mathematical steps regarding the integration of variables related to the balloon's shrinking process.

NYK
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A (spherical) rubbery balloon of 20 cm in diameter is filed with helium. The rubber balloon wall has a thickness of 0.05 cm and diffusivity of 0.1x10-10 cm2 /s for helium. When the balloon is left in the air at 25°C, helium leaks into the air by diffusion through the rubbery wall and, as a result, the balloon shrinks. The Henry constant for helium in the rubber is 5 mol/cm3 .atm.

(1) Derive an equation that correlates the balloon size to the time;

(2) Estimate the time required for the balloon to shrink to 10 cm in diameter.

(Note: The helium pressure in the balloon is 2 atm and is essentially constant during the shrinking process. To simplify calculation, a quasi steady state can be assumed for the problem).

Homework Equations



J = (DH/L)(Ca - Cb)
Q = J.A.Δt
d(v(P/RT))/dt = -SJ

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble starting this problem. I think that I need to somehow incorporate the mass balance with the flux equation. Then I get confused as to how I would derive the equation to equate the the balloon size as a function of time.

Does my though process sound like I am on the right track?

Thank you in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NYK said:

Homework Statement


A (spherical) rubbery balloon of 20 cm in diameter is filed with helium. The rubber balloon wall has a thickness of 0.05 cm and diffusivity of 0.1x10-10 cm2 /s for helium. When the balloon is left in the air at 25°C, helium leaks into the air by diffusion through the rubbery wall and, as a result, the balloon shrinks. The Henry constant for helium in the rubber is 5 mol/cm3 .atm.

(1) Derive an equation that correlates the balloon size to the time;

(2) Estimate the time required for the balloon to shrink to 10 cm in diameter.

(Note: The helium pressure in the balloon is 2 atm and is essentially constant during the shrinking process. To simplify calculation, a quasi steady state can be assumed for the problem).

Homework Equations



J = (DH/L)(Ca - Cb)
Q = J.A.Δt
d(v(P/RT))/dt = -SJ

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble starting this problem. I think that I need to somehow incorporate the mass balance with the flux equation. Then I get confused as to how I would derive the equation to equate the the balloon size as a function of time.

Does my though process sound like I am on the right track?
No. Let me try to help you get started.

How many moles of helium are in the balloon to start with?

What is the concentration of the helium that is dissolved in the rubber on the helium side of the wall?

Chet
 
Hi Chet thank you for the tips on getting started,

I used the ideal gas law (since the problem states to assume a quasi steady state) and found the number of moles of helium in the balloon initially to be:

n = PV/RT = (2 atm*33510.32cm^3)/(82.06(cm^3*atm/mol*K)*298.15K) = 2.739 mol He

Using n, I calculated the intial concentration of helium in the balloon to be:

Co = 2.739 mol/33510.32 cm^3 = 8.17 x 10^-5 mol He/cm^3

Next to find the concentration of helium dissolved in the rubber on the helium side I am trying to use:

J = (D/L)(Co-C1)

I am having trouble with finding the concentration out side of the balloon (C1)

Would i use the ideal gas law again as:

C1 = P/RT

then if so do I assume the pressure outside of the balloon to be 1 atm?

thank you for your assistance
 
NYK said:
Hi Chet thank you for the tips on getting started,

I used the ideal gas law (since the problem states to assume a quasi steady state) and found the number of moles of helium in the balloon initially to be:

n = PV/RT = (2 atm*33510.32cm^3)/(82.06(cm^3*atm/mol*K)*298.15K) = 2.739 mol He

This was the only part that was correct.
Using n, I calculated the intial concentration of helium in the balloon to be:

Co = 2.739 mol/33510.32 cm^3 = 8.17 x 10^-5 mol He/cm^3

Next to find the concentration of helium dissolved in the rubber on the helium side I am trying to use:

J = (D/L)(Co-C1)

I am having trouble with finding the concentration out side of the balloon (C1)

Would i use the ideal gas law again as:

C1 = P/RT

then if so do I assume the pressure outside of the balloon to be 1 atm?

thank you for your assistance
The concentration of helium dissolved in the rubber at the interface between the helium and balloon wall is determined by using the Helium pressure in the balloon and the Henry's law constant.

What do you think the partial pressure of the helium will be in the room air after it has seeped through the wall into the room air? Do you really think it will be 1 atm.?

Chet
 
Hi Chet, I am in a class right now, but just to run a thought by you before I am able to continue working on this problem, the partial pressure outside of the balloon of the helium would be 0 atm, there isn't any boundary creating a pressure when the helium escapes through the rubber walls to the outside environment.

Does that sound logical?

Then using henrys law:

P = HX

X = P/H
 
NYK said:
Hi Chet, I am in a class right now, but just to run a thought by you before I am able to continue working on this problem, the partial pressure outside of the balloon of the helium would be 0 atm, there isn't any boundary creating a pressure when the helium escapes through the rubber walls to the outside environment.

Does that sound logical?

Perfect.
Then using henrys law:

P = HX

X = P/H
Actually, Henry's law is expressed as C=HP. So give me a number.

Chet
 
Co = 10 mol/cm^3?
 
I am working on the same problem. Can Henry's constant be expressed as P/C=H?
 
http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/vc/theory/oxide.html

that is where i found C = HP

But I did find the same eqn you are talking about where H = P/C in the textbook
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Since the volume is changing and I assume the pressure is constant inside of the balloon, the mass balance gives me d(V(Pi/RT))/dt=0-S(DH/L)P and from there I assume that I can rearrange that and put S in terms of volume or radius
 
  • #11
S = 4πr2?

then d(V(P1/RT))/dt = -S((DH/L)P1)

dV/dt = -S(DH/L)RT

dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt
 
  • #12
NYK said:
Co = 10 mol/cm^3?
Correct.
 
  • #13
NYK said:
S = 4πr2?

then d(V(P1/RT))/dt = -S((DH/L)P1)

dV/dt = -S(DH/L)RT

dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt
Yes. What is dV in terms of r and dr?

Do you think you are supposed to take into account the fact that the balloon rubber is incompressible so that ##S(t)L(t)=S(0)L(0)##, or do you think they expect you to not realize that and assume that L is constant?
 
  • #14
  • #15
LDavis said:
When calculating the number of moles of He what information are you using for the V term, is it not the volume of a sphere with a 10cm radius which would be 4188.79? Where are you getting 33510.32cm^3 for the volume?

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/mass-transfer.841223/
Oh. He mistook the value of the diameter for the value of the radius. No big deal.

Chet
 
  • #16
Okay I just thought I missed something. So the idea then is to get all of the radius terms on one side of the equation to integrate from the starting radius to the final on the left and the starting and final times on the right. Does V also need to be rewritten in terms of r so we have (4/3πr^3)/(4πr^2 dr) Where the numerator is V and the denominator is S both in terms of r?
 
  • #17
LDavis said:
Okay I just thought I missed something. So the idea then is to get all of the radius terms on one side of the equation to integrate from the starting radius to the final on the left and the starting and final times on the right. Does V also need to be rewritten in terms of r so we have (4/3πr^3)/(4πr^2 dr) Where the numerator is V and the denominator is S both in terms of r?
I don't understand your question. Can you elaborate?

Chet
 
  • #18
Sorry. So the equation is dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt and I need all of the r terms on one side so

dV = -(4πr^2)(DH/L)RTdt

dV/(4πr^2) = -(DH/L)RTdt

from here would I rewrite V in terms of r to get

(4πr^3)/(4πr^2)dr = -(DH/L)RTdt

which would simplify to

rdr = -(DH/L)RTdt
 
  • #19
Sorry to take over your post NYX and thank you so much for your assistance thus far Chestermiller it is greatly appreciated:biggrin:
 
  • #20
LDavis said:
Sorry. So the equation is dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt and I need all of the r terms on one side so

dV = -(4πr^2)(DH/L)RTdt

dV/(4πr^2) = -(DH/L)RTdt

from here would I rewrite V in terms of r to get

(4πr^3)/(4πr^2)dr = -(DH/L)RTdt

which would simplify to

rdr = -(DH/L)RTdt
Looks OK, except that you differentiated the volume incorrectly.

Chet
 
  • #21
Chestermiller said:
Looks OK, except that you differentiated the volume incorrectly.

Chet

I am not sure where to go from there, was my simplification of (4πr^3)/(4πr^2)dr incorrect or does it not need to be simplified?
would r^3/r^2 dr be correct, this is where I've been stuck for a day, would it be simpler to right S in terms of V so i can just leave dV as is?
 
  • #22
LDavis said:
I am not sure where to go from there, was my simplification of (4πr^3)/(4πr^2)dr incorrect or does it not need to be simplified?
would r^3/r^2 dr be correct, this is where I've been stuck for a day, would it be simpler to right S in terms of V so i can just leave dV as is?
##dV=4πr^2dr##, not ##dV=4πr^3dr##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K