1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mass transfer

  1. Nov 3, 2015 #1

    NYK

    User Avatar

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A (spherical) rubbery balloon of 20 cm in diameter is filed with helium. The rubber balloon wall has a thickness of 0.05 cm and diffusivity of 0.1x10-10 cm2 /s for helium. When the balloon is left in the air at 25°C, helium leaks into the air by diffusion through the rubbery wall and, as a result, the balloon shrinks. The Henry constant for helium in the rubber is 5 mol/cm3 .atm.

    (1) Derive an equation that correlates the balloon size to the time;

    (2) Estimate the time required for the balloon to shrink to 10 cm in diameter.

    (Note: The helium pressure in the balloon is 2 atm and is essentially constant during the shrinking process. To simplify calculation, a quasi steady state can be assumed for the problem).

    2. Relevant equations

    J = (DH/L)(Ca - Cb)
    Q = J.A.Δt
    d(v(P/RT))/dt = -SJ

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I am having trouble starting this problem. I think that I need to somehow incorporate the mass balance with the flux equation. Then I get confused as to how I would derive the equation to equate the the balloon size as a function of time.

    Does my though process sound like I am on the right track?

    Thank you in advance for any help!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 4, 2015 #2
    No. Let me try to help you get started.

    How many moles of helium are in the balloon to start with?

    What is the concentration of the helium that is dissolved in the rubber on the helium side of the wall?

    Chet
     
  4. Nov 4, 2015 #3

    NYK

    User Avatar

    Hi Chet thank you for the tips on getting started,

    I used the ideal gas law (since the problem states to assume a quasi steady state) and found the number of moles of helium in the balloon initially to be:

    n = PV/RT = (2 atm*33510.32cm^3)/(82.06(cm^3*atm/mol*K)*298.15K) = 2.739 mol He

    Using n, I calculated the intial concentration of helium in the balloon to be:

    Co = 2.739 mol/33510.32 cm^3 = 8.17 x 10^-5 mol He/cm^3

    Next to find the concentration of helium dissolved in the rubber on the helium side I am trying to use:

    J = (D/L)(Co-C1)

    I am having trouble with finding the concentration out side of the balloon (C1)

    Would i use the ideal gas law again as:

    C1 = P/RT

    then if so do I assume the pressure outside of the balloon to be 1 atm?

    thank you for your assistance
     
  5. Nov 4, 2015 #4
    This was the only part that was correct.
    The concentration of helium dissolved in the rubber at the interface between the helium and balloon wall is determined by using the Helium pressure in the balloon and the Henry's law constant.

    What do you think the partial pressure of the helium will be in the room air after it has seeped through the wall into the room air? Do you really think it will be 1 atm.?

    Chet
     
  6. Nov 4, 2015 #5

    NYK

    User Avatar

    Hi Chet, I am in a class right now, but just to run a thought by you before I am able to continue working on this problem, the partial pressure outside of the balloon of the helium would be 0 atm, there isnt any boundary creating a pressure when the helium escapes through the rubber walls to the outside environment.

    Does that sound logical?

    Then using henrys law:

    P = HX

    X = P/H
     
  7. Nov 4, 2015 #6
    Perfect.
    Actually, Henry's law is expressed as C=HP. So give me a number.

    Chet
     
  8. Nov 4, 2015 #7

    NYK

    User Avatar

    Co = 10 mol/cm^3?
     
  9. Nov 4, 2015 #8
    I am working on the same problem. Can Henry's constant be expressed as P/C=H?
     
  10. Nov 4, 2015 #9

    NYK

    User Avatar

    http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/vc/theory/oxide.html [Broken]

    that is where i found C = HP

    But I did find the same eqn you are talking about where H = P/C in the text book
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
  11. Nov 4, 2015 #10
    Since the volume is changing and I assume the pressure is constant inside of the balloon, the mass balance gives me d(V(Pi/RT))/dt=0-S(DH/L)P and from there I assume that I can rearrange that and put S in terms of volume or radius
     
  12. Nov 4, 2015 #11

    NYK

    User Avatar

    S = 4πr2?

    then d(V(P1/RT))/dt = -S((DH/L)P1)

    dV/dt = -S(DH/L)RT

    dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt
     
  13. Nov 5, 2015 #12
    Correct.
     
  14. Nov 5, 2015 #13
    Yes. What is dV in terms of r and dr?

    Do you think you are supposed to take into account the fact that the balloon rubber is incompressible so that ##S(t)L(t)=S(0)L(0)##, or do you think they expect you to not realize that and assume that L is constant?
     
  15. Nov 5, 2015 #14
  16. Nov 5, 2015 #15
    Oh. He mistook the value of the diameter for the value of the radius. No big deal.

    Chet
     
  17. Nov 5, 2015 #16
    Okay I just thought I missed something. So the idea then is to get all of the radius terms on one side of the equation to integrate from the starting radius to the final on the left and the starting and final times on the right. Does V also need to be rewritten in terms of r so we have (4/3πr^3)/(4πr^2 dr) Where the numerator is V and the denominator is S both in terms of r?
     
  18. Nov 5, 2015 #17
    I don't understand your question. Can you elaborate?

    Chet
     
  19. Nov 5, 2015 #18
    Sorry. So the equation is dV = -(4πr2)(DH/L)RTdt and I need all of the r terms on one side so

    dV = -(4πr^2)(DH/L)RTdt

    dV/(4πr^2) = -(DH/L)RTdt

    from here would I rewrite V in terms of r to get

    (4πr^3)/(4πr^2)dr = -(DH/L)RTdt

    which would simplify to

    rdr = -(DH/L)RTdt
     
  20. Nov 5, 2015 #19
    Sorry to take over your post NYX and thank you so much for your assistance thus far Chestermiller it is greatly appreciated:biggrin:
     
  21. Nov 5, 2015 #20
    Looks OK, except that you differentiated the volume incorrectly.

    Chet
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Mass transfer
Loading...