Deriving Electric Field from Voltage

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field from voltage produced by a uniformly charged rod. The voltage at point X is given by the equation V = (Ke*Q/l)*[ln(l+sqr(l^2+a^2))-ln(a)], where Ke is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge, l is the rod's length, and a is the distance from the left end of the rod. The y-component of the electric field at point X is determined by taking the negative partial derivative of V with respect to a, resulting in Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)]. The correct approach emphasizes differentiating with respect to 'a' only.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with electric fields and voltage concepts
  • Knowledge of the equation for voltage due to a uniformly charged rod
  • Basic grasp of logarithmic functions and square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric fields and potentials in electrostatics
  • Learn about partial differentiation in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the applications of Coulomb's law in electric field calculations
  • Investigate the behavior of logarithmic functions in physical equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as educators teaching calculus applications in physics.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
This is probably more Calculus than it is physics. The voltage at a point X produced by a uniformly charged rod is V = (Ke*Q/l)*[ln(l+sqr(l^2+a^2))-ln(a)], in which point X is right above the left end of the rod by a distance a, l is the rod's length, Q is the charge of the rod, and Ke as the constant (sqr( ) refers to square root and ln is natural log).

X(point X a distance a from the left end of the rod, in which a is constant)


__________________ (uniformly charged rod)

I'm supposed to find the y-component of the Electric Field at X, in which I would just find the negative partial derivative of V in respect to y. Would that imply that I derive in respect to a? I've actually tried quite a number of derivations, but they always end up in something lengthy. The answer is Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
Would that imply that I derive in respect to a? I've actually tried quite a number of derivations, but they always end up in something lengthy. The answer is Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)].

You are correct and so is the final answer. Try it once more. Remember, you have to differentiate wrt 'a' only. (There's a factor (l + sqrt(l^2+a^2) which cancels out.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K