Deriving Inverse Hyperbolic Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter MattL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Inverse
AI Thread Summary
To derive arcsinh(x) from the definition of sinh(x), start with the equation sinh(arcsinh(x)) = x and let arcsinh(x) = z. This leads to the equation e^z - e^{-z} = 2x, which can be rearranged into a quadratic form in e^z. Solving this quadratic equation allows for the determination of arcsinh(x). It is noted that arcsinh is defined for all real numbers, while other inverse hyperbolic functions like arccosh have specific domain restrictions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these domains when working with inverse functions.
MattL
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question

Can anyone give a method to derive arcsinh(x) from the definition of sinh(x)?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\sinh{x} = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}.

Assuming the existence of arcsinh, for every x we must have:

sinh(arcsinh(x)) = x.

For simplicity, let arcsinh(x) = z, so that

\sinh(z) = x

<=>

e^z - e^{-z} = 2x

<=>

(e^z)^2 - 1 = e^z \cdot 2x

That's a quadratic equation in e^z, which can be easily solved.
 
thanks

haven't done that since a-level and had forgotten it completely!
 
Since it's a quadratic equation,u'll need to specify the domain.Note that the direct function is defined on all \mathbb{R},while I'm sure u can't say the same about its inverse.

Daniel.
 
I think arcsinh is ok on all of \mathbb{R}
With arccosh x has to be greater than or equal to one, but I can't remember the conditions for arctanh
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top