Deriving Lagrange's & Hamilton's Equations in 1-Dimension

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ed Quanta
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the derivation of Lagrange's equations and Hamilton's equations in one dimension, exploring the principles and mathematical foundations behind these formulations in classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a derivation of Lagrange's equations and inquires about the similarity in deriving Hamilton's equations.
  • Several participants suggest consulting classical mechanics textbooks, mentioning authors such as Goldstein, Marion & Thornton, Corben & Stehle, and Landau, indicating these resources contain the necessary derivations.
  • Another participant highlights the readability and problem sets in Landau and Lifschitz's textbook, recommending it for its concise treatment of the subject.
  • A participant mentions that the principle of stationary action is essential for deriving Lagrange's and Hamilton's equations, suggesting that it applies even in field theory.
  • One participant provides a detailed derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation, outlining the steps involved in applying the principle of stationary action and the conditions necessary for the derivation.
  • A later reply expresses uncertainty about formatting LaTeX symbols correctly in the forum, indicating a potential barrier to clear communication of mathematical expressions.
  • Another participant points out a formatting error in a previous post, suggesting that proper spacing is needed after certain symbols.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of classical mechanics textbooks for understanding the derivations, but there is no consensus on the best approach or resources for deriving the equations. The discussion remains open with various perspectives on the derivation process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific mathematical principles and assumptions, such as the Hessian determinant and boundary conditions, which may not be universally understood without further context. The discussion includes unresolved formatting issues related to mathematical notation.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Can someone direct me towards or provide me with a derivation of Lagrange's equations in one dimension? Are Hamilton's equations derived in a similar manner?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you could probably find both these things in any reasonable textbook on classical mechanics. Goldstein, Marion & Thornton, Corben & Stehle, Landau, any of those.
 
Landau and Lifschitz

StatMechGuy said:
I think you could probably find both these things in any reasonable textbook on classical mechanics. Goldstein, Marion & Thornton, Corben & Stehle, Landau, any of those.

I was just going to suggest Landau and Lifschitz, Mechanics, Pergamon, 1976. This classic textbook is short and sweet, highly readable, has many excellent problems, and is often cited and should be widely available e.g. via amazon.com
 
Yeah, an eighth of the book is homage to Landau.
 
Yes, Landau is brilliant ! Another book, for the more mathematically inclined, is Arnold.
 
i suggest you also "Mathematical methods for physics" Vladimir Arnold (i think this is the english translation.).
I think is the best because of its wide mathematical explanations. very good appendix.
To derive Lagrange's or hamilton's equation you just need the least action principle, or better the principle of stationary action.
applying this principle you get the right equations of motion even for fileds theory.
then if the hessian determinant of the Lagrangian or Hamiltonian is different form zero you can connect them via Legendre trasformation...
For a particle:

remeber that [tex]L=L(q,\dot{q})[/tex]
THE PRINCIPLE STATES THAT:

[tex]\delta\int L dt=\int\delta L dt=0[/tex]

[tex]\int\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}\delta q+ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\delta\dot{q} dt=0[/tex]

now integrating by parts the second term of this integral and making the assumption that the little variations

[tex]\deltaq[/tex]

vanishes at the boundary. you get:

[tex]\int(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}})\deltaq dt=0[/tex]

so if it is zero for arbitrary [tex]\delta q[/tex] it must be:

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}=0[/tex]

which is the Eulero Lagrange equation for a single particle with a single degree of freedom. The equations for three degree of freedom are soon obtained using indices, the same for a system of particles.

bye MArco
 
Last edited:
I hope u can read i don't know what's going with latex,
i don't know if i understood right how to put symbols inside thge forum.

bye bye :-)
 
You forgot to add a space after the code. Click on this symbol for the code.
[tex]\delta q[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K