Deriving Rotation Matrix from Strang pg.230

  • Thread starter Thread starter interested_learner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the rotation matrix from the matrix K as presented in Strang's textbook, specifically on page 230. The matrix K is defined as K = [[0, -1], [1, 0]], and the goal is to show that e^(Kt) results in the rotation matrix [[cos(t), -sin(t)], [sin(t), cos(t)]] without providing a complete solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the exponential of the matrix K by considering its powers and the series expansion for the exponential function. Some discuss the eigenvalues of K and the implications of diagonalization for simplifying the computation of e^(Kt).

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to derive the rotation matrix, with some participants providing insights into the diagonalization of K and the use of Taylor series for matrix exponentiation. There is acknowledgment of the clarity in the responses, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework problem, focusing on deriving the result without directly providing the final answer. The discussion reflects an exploration of mathematical concepts related to matrix exponentiation and rotation transformations.

interested_learner
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
This is another attempt at an earlier question that maybe wasn't done in a readable format.

This was in Strang page 230. Could someone derive this?

[tex] if K = \left[\begin{array} {cc} 0&-1\\1&0\end{array}\right]<br /> <br /> then \quad e^{Kt} = \left[\begin{array} {cc} cos t & -sin t\\sin t & cos t\end{array}\right][/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
By working out what exp{Kt} looks like: K has a nice form, so do the powers of K, hence it is possible to simply work out what the sum defining exp{Kt} is.
 
The eigenvalues of K are i and -i so, over the complex numbers, K is equivalent to the diagonal matrix with i and -i on the diagonal. In fact, since the corresponding eigenvectors are multiples of [1, -i] and [1, i] respectively, we have:
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{cc}0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 1 \\-i & i \end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{cc}i & 0 \\0 & -i\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{i}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\-\frac{i}{2} & -\frac{1}{2}\end{array}\right][/tex]

The point of "diagonalizing" like that is that if [itex]A= CDC^{-1}[/itex] then [itex]A^2= (CDC^{-1})(CDC^{-1})= CD^2C^{-1}[/itex] and similarly for higher powers. Then, using the Taylor's series for ex:[itex]e^x= 1+ x+ \frac{1}{2}x^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}x^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/itex], we have
[tex]e^{CDC^{-1}}= I+ CDC^{-1}+ \frac{1}{2}CD^2C^{-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \frac{1}{n!}CD^nC^{-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot[/tex]
Since I= CC-1, that is
[tex]C(I+ D+ \frac{1}{2}D^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}D^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot = Ce^DC^{-1}[/tex]
For a diagonal matrix, powers just give powers on the diagonal and adding just adds the diagonal values, for diagonal matrix D, eD is just the diagonal matrix with exponentials on the diagonal. In this case
[tex]e^{Kt}= \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 & 1 \\-i & i \end{array}\right]\left[ \begin{array}{cc}e^{it} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-it}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{i}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\-\frac{i}{2} & -\frac{1}{2}\end{array}\right][/tex]
Use [itex]e^{it}= cos(t)+ isin(t)[/itex] and multiply it out.
 
Wow! Thanks

Wow! Such a quick and clear answer. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K