Deriving the energy density of the Electric Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the energy density of the electric field generated by two protons separated by a distance b, as outlined in Purcell Problem 1.33. The potential energy is expressed as U=∫E2dv, with E1 and E2 representing the electric fields of each proton. The integral ε0∫E1⋅E2dv is evaluated, leading to the conclusion that the value is e2/4πε0b. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying Coulomb's Law and the laws of cosines and sines to simplify the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for Electric Fields
  • Vector Calculus, specifically dot products
  • Understanding of electric field concepts in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Coulomb's Law in multi-charge systems
  • Learn about vector calculus in the context of electric fields
  • Explore the laws of cosines and sines for solving physics problems
  • Investigate energy density calculations in electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in solving complex problems related to electric fields and potential energy in multi-charge systems.

KvGroOve

Homework Statement


Taken from Purcell Problem 1.33
Consider the electric field of two protons a distance b apart. The potential energy of the system ought to be given by

U=∫E2dv.

Let E1 be the field of one particle alone and E2 that of the other. Evaluate

ε0E1E2dv.

Set one of the protons at the origin and the other on the polar axis. Perform the integration over r before the integration over θ. Show that the integral has the value e2/4πε0b.

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I uploaded my attempt. I started by applying Coulomb's Law for Electric Fields to both protons. I broke down r1 and r2 into their Cartesian components to perform the dot product between the two. Since the two charges were both on the Polar Axis (I think I chose the right axis), I set φ12. I assumed that r1=r and θ1=θ. I eventually got an expression involving r22 and Cos[θ2-θ]. I was able to rewrite r22 using the law of cosines. I have no idea how to address θ2. I figured that I could use the law of sines to figure it out but the expression turns out to be really messy. I'm not really sure if I'm on the right track or if I've made an error anywhere.

Any advice regarding my mistakes and/or pointing me in the right direction would be much appreciated! Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Image.png
    Image.png
    25.4 KB · Views: 883
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that your ##\theta_2 - \theta_1## is just the angle ##\beta## between the two position vectors. You could have gotten your final expression for ##\mathbf r_2 \cdot \mathbf r_1## more easily by thinking of the dot product in terms of the angle between the vectors.
upload_2017-9-5_13-10-23.png

Your idea of proceeding with the law of cosines and the law of sines sounds good to me.
##\cos \beta## will simplify fairly nicely in terms of ##\theta##, ##r_1## and ##r_2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KvGroOve
Something seems funny to me. The total electric field is ##\mathbf{E_{T}}=\mathbf{E_{1}}+\mathbf{E_{2}}## so the energy density of the field is
$$u=\frac{\epsilon}{2}|\mathbf{E_{T}}|^{2}=\epsilon\left[\frac{1}{2}E_{1}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}E_{2}^{2}+\mathbf{E_{1}}\cdot\mathbf{E_{2}}\right]$$
not
$$u=\mathbf{E_{1}}\cdot\mathbf{E_{2}}$$
as shown in the problem. Are you actually finding the energy of the electric field or do you just need to solve the integral they gave you?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KvGroOve
NFuller said:
Are you actually finding the energy of the electric field or do you just need to solve the integral they gave you?
The E12 and E22 contributions are "self-energy" contributions which are infinite for point charges. A physicist just sweeps these under the rug :blushing:. The dot product part is the energy of interaction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KvGroOve and NFuller
I finally got it. I don't think I did it elegantly because I had to use Mathematica to help me solve an integral. Regardless, thanks for your help, TSny!
 

Attachments

  • Purcell1.33(2).png
    Purcell1.33(2).png
    15.8 KB · Views: 692
OK. Good. To do the r integration, you can do a substitution letting u be the expression inside the ( ... )3/2 in the denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KvGroOve
Wow. That makes it such a trivial integral to solve - I can't help but to laugh. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
861
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K