Deriving the Hamiltonian of a system given the Lagrangian

astroholly
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Derive the Hamiltonian, H([q][/1], [q][/2], [p][/1], [p][/1]), of a system that has the Lagrngian, L(q_1, q_2, \dot{q_1}, \dot{q_2}) = \dot{q_1}^2 + 0.5 \dot{q_2}^2 + 3q_1^2 + \dot{q_1} * \dot{q_2}
Relevant Equations
H(q_1, q_2, p_1, p_2) = sum over i (p_i \dot{q_i}) - L

L(q_1, q_2, \dot{q_1}, \dot{q_2}) = \dot{q_1}^2 + 0.5 \dot{q_2}^2 + 3q_1^2 + \dot{q_1} * \dot{q_2}
I have found the Hamiltonian to be ##H = L - 6 (q_1)^2## using the method below:

1. Find momenta using δL/δ\dot{q_i}
2. Apply Hamiltonian equation: H = sum over i (p_i \dot{q_i}) - L 3(q_1)^2. Simplifying result by combining terms
4. Comparing the given Lagrangian to the resulting Hamiltonian I found H =\dot{q_1}^2 + 0.5 \dot{q_2}^2 + \dot{q_1} * \dot{q_2} - 3q_1^2 = L - 6(q_1)^2 This is wrong because my Hamiltonian should be in terms of generalised coordinate and momentum only: H(q_1, q_2, p_1, p_2). What am I neglecting?
 

Attachments

  • 2021.jpeg
    2021.jpeg
    57.8 KB · Views: 115
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the equations for ##p_i## you could find ##\dot{q_i}##. Substituting these everywhere, you get the expression in terms of ##q_i## and ##p_i## only.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PhDeezNutz
^^^ That

The Hamiltonian is supposed to be a function of just the ##q_i##'s and ##p_i##'s so once you find the conjugate momenta via

##p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}## you need to re-arange and solve for each of the ##\dot{q}_i##'s and then plug it into

##H = \sum_{i=1}^{2} p_i \dot{q}_i - L##

You need to re-express ##L## in terms of the phase space variables ##q_i##'s and ##p_i##'s as well....after all that is the "second part of the hamiltonian"
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Hill
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top