Deriving the Michelson Interferometer Equation: d_m = (m[lambda])/2

NovaKing
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
does anyone know how to derive this equation regarding the Michelson interferometer:

d_m = (m[lambda])/2

where d_m is the physical distance of a micrometer division, m is the number of fringes that crosses a screen given some d_m and lambda is the wavelength of the laser used to create the interference pattern.

I understand that the path difference divided by the wavelength is responsible for the number of fringes that pass by a certain mark, but I don't understand where the 2 comes from. Can someone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh hehe never mind.


as it turns out because the path difference divided by the wavelength is number of fringes that pass I can set up a diagram to evaluate the problem.

Quite simply, the change in distance for the interferometer which has an arm that changes length is just 2L - 2(L-d_m) which gets 2d_m as the change in distance. Thus:

2d_m = m[lambda]

or

d_m = (m[lambda])/2


how silly of me
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top