Deriving the Moment of Inertia for a Rod with a Pivot at One End

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the moment of inertia for a rod pivoted at one end, specifically focusing on the acceleration experienced by the rod when one end is fixed as a pivot. The subject area includes rotational dynamics and the application of the parallel axis theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the parallel axis theorem to derive the moment of inertia and calculates the angular acceleration using torque and moment of inertia. They express confusion over an extra length term in their final expression.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the calculations, noting that the original poster's approach is correct but that they need to relate angular acceleration to linear acceleration. This indicates a productive direction in clarifying the relationship between the two forms of acceleration.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's question appears to stem from a misunderstanding of the relationship between angular and linear quantities in rotational motion. There is an implication of missing information regarding the specific requirements of the problem.

wolf party
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
a plank is conected horizontally at both ends to two points. One of the points dissapears and the other turns into a pivot. show that the Planck of length l,mass m pivoted at one end has an acceleration (3/2)*g initially



i used parallel axis theorem do derive the moment of inertia of a rod with pivot at one end
I = 1/3 (M*L*L)

the torque acting at the CM of rod
TAU=-Mg(postion of cm)=-Mg(x(cm))=-(0.5*l)Mg

Newtons second law in rotation

ALPHA = TAU/I = (-0.5*l)Mg/(1/3*M*L*L) = (-) 3/2*g*l


this is not what the question wanted as i have an extra l, what have i missed? thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anybody?
 
Your answer is correct, but they are asking for the acceleration which is equal to ALPHA*l
 
Last edited:
cheers
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K