Desciribing intensity of human scream?

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarsh5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the myth that a human scream could produce enough energy to warm a cup of coffee over a period of 8 years, 7 months, and 6 days. Participants analyze the sound intensity of an average scream, estimated at 80 dB, and debate whether the area of the mouth opening should be considered in calculations of sound power. It is clarified that 80 dB corresponds to 0.0001 watts of acoustic power, but the confusion arises from the distinction between sound power level and perceived loudness. The conversation highlights the need for precise definitions in sound measurement, particularly regarding watts versus watts per square meter. Overall, the calculations suggest that the original claim may be exaggerated or misleading.
utkarsh5
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
i was trying to verify the '8 years 7 months 6 days' myth/fact that states that you would have you scream for that much time to produce enough energy to warm up a cup of coffee. i assume that an average human screams at 80 dB.if i have to calculate the power,do i have to take the area of mouth opening into account?i think i do,but in the following article,the person who answered the question did not take it into account(or as it seems).

http://www.physicscentral.com/explore/poster-coffee.cfm

please answer.any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in the following article,the person who answered the question did not take [area of mouth opening] into account
It appears the author did - from the article cited:
80 decibels produces .001 watts of energy(sic)
... the intensity from the sound would be in watts per square meter.

80dB would be about 1x10-4Wm-2 ... so he seems to have used an area of about 10m2 ... which seems a little large. Perhaps the author has a big mouth?

The whole thing is suspect isn't it - I'm sure I can make myself heard in the front rows of a rock concert - well, by yelling in someone's ear.
If I yell at a cup of coffee the same intensity that is more like 0.1Wm-2. Figure a mouth area of about a square decimeter
(0.1m x 0.1m = 0.01m-2) and that's 0.001W directed at the cup.

So the final figure is about right.

ref. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/sound/u11l2b.cfm
 
Last edited:
"Decibels" are used to measure serveral different quantities. Your link seems to be talking about "sound power level" (SPL) whcih measures the total acoustic power that the sound source (i.e. the scream) generates. That is not the same as "how loud the scream sounds" which depends how far away from the source you are, and the fact that the sound may be directional.

1 dB SPL is arbitrarily defined as ##10^{-12}## watts of acoustic power, so 80 dB SPL = 0.0001 W

Assuming 80db is the right SPL, your link gives the time if you can somehow capture all the power from the scream and use it to heat the coffee.

Edit: I was writing this when Simon Birdge posted, but note that SPL is measured in watts, not in watts/meter^2. The OP's link isn't very clear exactly what it means by "decibels", though.
 
Last edited:
@AlephZero: yes, I noticed that too.
The author could just be using a different scale to me.
 
thanks for the replies!what confused me was exactly that the author had not used watts/(meter^2),and had used just watts.that was pretty strange.anyways,thanks for the clarification! :D
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top