Description using Newton's laws

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheShapeOfTime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Newton's laws
AI Thread Summary
In discussing a car making a left turn, Newton's first law explains that objects inside the car tend to move outward due to inertia. The second law raises questions about the unbalanced forces acting on the car, which are primarily provided by friction between the tires and the road. The third law is relevant in that the car exerts a downward force on the road, and the road exerts an equal and opposite force back on the car. However, the third law does not directly explain the turning motion itself; rather, it highlights the interaction between the car and the road. Without friction, the car would be unable to turn effectively, illustrating the importance of these forces in motion.
TheShapeOfTime
Let's use the scenerio of a car going from uniform motion, to a turn to the left. I'm trying to describe this in relation to Newton's laws in hopes to get a greater understanding. What I know is that objects in the car are affected by Newton's first law, which states (among other things) that objects in motion wish to stay in motion. Thus, the objects move towards the outside of the turn. As for the second law, what causes the unbalanced force? Does the third law come into play here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot that the car itself isn't an inertial reference frame. This is an accelerating reference frame we're talking about. To compensate for the frame change, we have to add a force on every object inside the frame, pointing in the opposite direction to the movement of the reference frame.
If you judge from an outsider's point of view, the object is just moving in a straight line.

You don't need the third law to explain this.
 
TheShapeOfTime said:
What I know is that objects in the car are affected by Newton's first law, which states (among other things) that objects in motion wish to stay in motion. Thus, the objects move towards the outside of the turn.
Right. Unless a force is exerted on an object, it will keep moving in a straight line. For objects not firmly attached to the car, that's just what they do. (From inside the car it looks like they are being pulled towards the outside of the turn.)
As for the second law, what causes the unbalanced force?
What do you think? What's the only thing (except for air) in contact with the car?
 
Doc Al said:
What do you think? What's the only thing (except for air) in contact with the car?

The road. :)

From what I understand, the third law is applies only when a force is applied to an object. In this example, the car pushes down on the road, and the road pushes back with equal force. But, the third law has nothing to do with the turning (unbalanced forces).
 
Right. If not for the road exerting a sideways force on the car, the car could not turn. For an unbanked road, that force is a friction force. Take away the friction--try making a sharp turn on a patch of oil or a sheet of ice--and you can't make the turn.

Of course, whenever a force is exerted, Newton's 3rd law comes into play. If the road pushes the car, the car pushes the road.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top