Design of Cheap Packaging for Pressure Sensor (Piezoresistive)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the design of a cost-effective packaging solution for a piezoresistive pressure sensor using a parylene layer. The author employs ANSYS to determine the optimal thickness of a 4µm parylene layer over an 80µm silicon diaphragm. The objective is to analyze the cushioning effect of an additional PDMS layer, characterized by a Young's modulus of 2.7 GPa and a Poisson ratio of 0.4, on the sensor's sensitivity. The author seeks validation of their modeling approach and its implications on sensor performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Piezoresistive sensor technology
  • ANSYS simulation software
  • Material properties of Parylene and PDMS
  • Finite element analysis (FEA) principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of Parylene coatings on sensor performance
  • Explore advanced modeling techniques in ANSYS for layered materials
  • Investigate the effects of varying PDMS thickness on sensitivity
  • Review literature on diaphragm design for pressure sensors
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers involved in sensor design, particularly those focusing on packaging solutions for piezoresistive pressure sensors and material interactions in sensor applications.

RogelioAguirre
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Dear Colleagues,
I am working in the design of one packaging for pressure sensor (piezoresistive), this packaging should be really cheap, I want to use a layer of parylene to cover the surface of the Silicon Pressure sensor, which include the diaphragm with the piezoresistive materials, I am using ANSYS to select the optimal thickness of the layer of parylene.

Currently I am using a simple linear and isotropic model, that is just a diaphragm of silicon of thickness 80 um and over the this diaphragm, a layer of 4um of Parylene, I am just interested in know the "cushioning effect" of my the extra PDMS layer over my sensor, that is, the loss of sensitivity. The data for the PDMS I am using is:
Young modulus 2.7 GPA
Poisson Ratio 0.4

Then I am applying the pressure to the model over the Parylene Area, and getting the displacement and stress in the area of the diaphragm of my pressure sensor, that is, just below of the parylene layer. Is this approach correct? I found some papers using an approach very similar to my idea, but I want to check with you guys. What I want to know is the effect of the Parylene layer on the performance of my sensor.

I hope you can help me.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K