Design of High-pass Passive Filter

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a high-pass passive filter intended to pass frequencies greater than 20 Hz, with a -3dB point set at 10 Hz. Participants explore the selection of resistor and capacitor values while considering practical implications and constraints of the components used.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the initial design of a high-pass RC filter, questioning how to select an appropriate resistor value and its relationship to the -3dB frequency.
  • Another participant suggests using the load resistor in parallel with the output resistor to determine the effective resistance for the filter design.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of using a 16pF capacitor at low frequencies, with suggestions to start with a larger capacitor value, such as 1uF.
  • A later reply discusses the implications of using a 1.5uF capacitor, suggesting it yields a suitable -3dB frequency close to the desired point.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of creating a non-polar capacitor by connecting two polar capacitors back-to-back, which is noted as a useful technique.
  • Errors in initial calculations are pointed out, with one participant correcting the capacitance value from 16pF to 16uF, leading to further clarification and acknowledgment of the mistake.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the optimal values for R and C, as participants propose different approaches and values based on practical considerations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best configuration and component values for the filter design.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of component values on the filter's performance, and there are unresolved calculations regarding the selection of R and C values that may affect the design's feasibility.

LickMyEyeball
Messages
23
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Design a filter that will pass frequencies greater than 20 Hz and set the -3dB point at 10 Hz. Assume zero source impedance and 10k load impedance.

Homework Equations


##f=\frac{1}{2\pi RC}## which is the equation used to determine the 3 dB frequency of an RC filter.

The Attempt at a Solution


Select a high-pass RC filter. Active filters have no been presented yet in the text, so I am using passive components.
As the input impedence of the load is assumed to be 10k, then I would like the output impedence of my filter to be about 1k: a tenth of the load.
Deriving the output impedence of the high-pass filter:
<br /> Z_{input}=\frac{Z_{C} R}{R+Z_{C}}=\frac{\frac{R}{j\omega C}}{R+\frac{1}{j\omega C}}=\frac{R}{j\omega R C +1}<br />
The next step is where my thinking is unclear. While I know that I want this output impedence to be about 1k, what kind of value should I select R to be and why? Does the 3 dB frequency I am designing for affect this in any way or is it independent?
Arbitrarily assuming an R value of 1k to match the impedence I want yields the following:
## \frac{1}{C}=2\pi fR## so ##C=\frac{1}{20\pi R}=16 pF##

The design is complete.

The information I am looking for is how to select an R value and why.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LickMyEyeball said:

Homework Statement


Design a filter that will pass frequencies greater than 20 Hz and set the -3dB point at 10 Hz. Assume zero source impedance and 10k load impedance.

Homework Equations


##f=\frac{1}{2\pi RC}## which is the equation used to determine the 3 dB frequency of an RC filter.

The Attempt at a Solution


Select a high-pass RC filter. Active filters have no been presented yet in the text, so I am using passive components.
As the input impedence of the load is assumed to be 10k, then I would like the output impedence of my filter to be about 1k: a tenth of the load.
Deriving the output impedence of the high-pass filter:
<br /> Z_{input}=\frac{Z_{C} R}{R+Z_{C}}=\frac{\frac{R}{j\omega C}}{R+\frac{1}{j\omega C}}=\frac{R}{j\omega R C +1}<br />
The next step is where my thinking is unclear. While I know that I want this output impedence to be about 1k, what kind of value should I select R to be and why? Does the 3 dB frequency I am designing for affect this in any way or is it independent?
Arbitrarily assuming an R value of 1k to match the impedence I want yields the following:
## \frac{1}{C}=2\pi fR## so ##C=\frac{1}{20\pi R}=16 pF##

The design is complete.

The information I am looking for is how to select an R value and why.

Thank you in advance.

For a single pole HPF, you have an input capacitor and an output resistor in series. Just put that 10k load resistor in parallel with your output resistor and use the parallel combination value for your R of the filter.

And 16pF is *way* too small to be used at this low frequency. You pick your combination of R & C to be some practical values. The biggest non-polar capacitor that is not too physically big and expensive is around 1uF. Start with that value to see what value of R you need to get that -3dB point, and go from there... :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LickMyEyeball
berkeman said:
And 16pF is *way* too small to be used at this low frequency. You pick your combination of R & C to be some practical values. The biggest non-polar capacitor that is not too physically big and expensive is around 1uF. Start with that value to see what value of R you need to get that -3dB point, and go from there.

Thank you very much for your reply. I assume that the problem with having selected a 16pF capacitor is that they do not come in a non-polar variety and a signal may require going into negative voltages?

berkeman said:
For a single pole HPF, you have an input capacitor and an output resistor in series. Just put that 10k load resistor in parallel with your output resistor and use the parallel combination value for your R of the filter.

Starting with a 1uF capacitor and a 10Hz point for the 3dB frequency yields an equivalent resistance of 16kΩ. Due to the load resistance being 10kΩ and the network being a parallel configuration, the 16kΩ value is impossible to attain without changing the network topology.

If I cannot go larger than 1.0uF, then this is more complicated than I was thinking. Knowing that the load resistance is 10kΩ, I can neglect the extra resistor entirely. Using a capacitance of 1.5uF would yield a 3dB frequency of 10.6 Hz, which may be close enough?
 
LickMyEyeball said:
I assume that the problem with having selected a 16pF capacitor is that they do not come in a non-polar variety
No, 16pF is a very small capacitance, and only comes in non-polar versions. It's just that using 16pF at 10Hz would require a huge resistance value (impractical).

LickMyEyeball said:
Knowing that the load resistance is 10kΩ, I can neglect the extra resistor entirely. Using a capacitance of 1.5uF would yield a 3dB frequency of 10.6 Hz, which may be close enough?
That works. Also, you can make a non-polar capacitor of a larger value by putting two polar caps back-to-back. This is done commonly in audio power circuits. For example, you can place two electrolytic 22uF caps back-to-back to make an 11uF non-polar capacitor. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LickMyEyeball
berkeman said:
you can place two electrolytic 22uF caps back-to-back to make an 11uF non-polar capacitor. :smile:

This is really awesome to know! It makes sense, but I'd never be sure enough of how the caps work to actually try it. Thanks!
 
Just for info...

In your first post you made an error in the calculation.

1/(20*π*1,000) = 16uF not 16pF
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LickMyEyeball and berkeman
CWatters said:
Just for info...

In your first post you made an error in the calculation.

1/(20*π*1,000) = 16uF not 16pF
Very right, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K