Cascaded low-pass filter followed by a buffer amplifier

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving a cascaded low-pass filter followed by a buffer amplifier. Participants explore the transfer function, the 3dB frequency, and the overall gain and phase of the system at specific frequencies. The conversation includes technical reasoning, clarifications on the behavior of the components, and the implications of cascading stages.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the transfer function and calculates the 3dB frequency based on given resistor and capacitor values.
  • Another participant questions the expectation of a negative transfer function, noting that the buffer amplifier should provide a gain of +1.
  • There is a discussion about the phase shifts of the cascaded filters and whether they can be simply added.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the feedback nature of the buffer amplifier and its implications for gain and transfer function.
  • Clarifications are made about the rules for ideal op-amps, including infinite input impedance and zero output impedance.
  • One participant concludes that the overall transfer function will be raised to the fourth power due to the four cascaded stages, and the phase shift will also be multiplied accordingly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the behavior of the buffer amplifier and the nature of the transfer function, but there are differing views on the implications of negative feedback and the overall gain of the system. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the gain and transfer function in the context of feedback.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the overall gain calculation with the -80 dB roll-off and the effects of cascading stages on the transfer function. There are also unresolved questions about the potential differences in the op-amp inputs under negative feedback conditions.

topcat123
Messages
77
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


3. FIGURE 3(a) shows a simple low-pass filter followed by a buffer
amplifier.
(a) Write down the transfer function for the filter.
(b) Determine the 3db frequency (fc) if R = 10 kΩ and C = 10 nF.
(c) If four such stages are cascaded as shown in FIGURE 3(b),
determine the gain and phase of the overall transfer function at
(i) 0.1fc
(ii) 10fc.

Homework Equations


The Transfer function
\frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\frac{-1}{1+j\frac{{\omega}}{{\omega}_c}}
The natural frequency at -3dB
f_c=\frac{1}{2{\pi}RC}

The Attempt at a Solution


a) as above the transfer function
b)f_c=\frac{1}{2{\pi}RC}=\frac{1}{2{\pi}10000*10*10^{-9}}=1.59KHz

c) I am a bit stuck with this one

I know
The resulting RC filter circuit would be known as an “nth-order” filter with a roll-off slope of “n x -20dB/decade”.
So the roll off of this 4th order filter would be -80dB
The phase shift for a single low pass filter is-arctan(2{\pi}fRC)=-arctan(\frac{f}{f_c})I am asuming that the phase shifts of all 4 can be added?

All help is apreciated
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Fig 3(a).JPG
    Fig 3(a).JPG
    5.8 KB · Views: 728
  • Fig 3(b).JPG
    Fig 3(b).JPG
    9.6 KB · Views: 704
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you expect a NEGATIVE transfer function?`The buffer provides a gain of "+1", does it not?
 
Check the buffer stage. What's its gain?

Yes, with the buffer amplifier in place the phase shifts can simply be added.Edit: Oops! LvW got there ahead of me!
 
I figured it would have -ve feedback as the output feeds back into the inverting input.

how do I workout the overall gain with the -80 dB roll off?
 
topcat123 said:
I figured it would have -ve feedback as the output feeds back into the inverting input.
What are the "rules" for the ideal op-amp?
how do I workout the overall gain with the -80 dB roll off?
The stage are cascaded. Thanks to the buffers they don't load each other or affect each other's individual transfer functions. So each transfer function applies, one at a time, as you pass from one to the next...
 
gneill said:
What are the "rules" for the ideal op-amp?

am ideal op-amp will have infinite input impedance infinite gain and zero output impedance.

gneill said:
So each transfer function applies, one at a time, as you pass from one to the next

so the output of the first becomes the input to the second and so on?

thanks
 
topcat123 said:
am ideal op-amp will have infinite input impedance infinite gain and zero output impedance.
Yes, and as a consequence what is the rule of thumb for the potential difference between the inputs (when negative feedback is present)?
so the output of the first becomes the input to the second and so on?
Yes.
 
gneill said:
Yes, and as a consequence what is the rule of thumb for the potential difference between the inputs (when negative feedback is present)?

As the feed back is negative and at unity then 0V potential difference.
But I believe there is actual a small amount. Because the gain is large this small difference is amplified so the output become almost equal to non-inverting input voltage at a point of equilibrium.
 
topcat123 said:
As the feed back is negative and at unity then 0V potential difference.
But I believe there is actual a small amount. Because the gain is large this small difference is amplified so the output become almost equal to non-inverting input voltage at a point of equilibrium.
Okay. So then, taking that into consideration, is the gain of the stage positive or negative?
 
  • #10
gneill said:
Okay. So then, taking that into consideration, is the gain of the stage positive or negative?

Ah I get it the gain is clearly positive +1 and so must the TF
And the feedback is negative.

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gneill
  • #11
so as far as I figure the TF will be \frac{V_{out}}{V_{in}}=\left(\frac{1}{1+j\frac{{\omega}}{{\omega}_C}}\right)^4

And the phase shift is (-arctan(2{\pi}fRC))*4
 
Last edited:
  • #12
That looks reasonable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topcat123

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K