Design Regulated Dual Supply w/uA78L05 for Research Project

  • Thread starter Thread starter gaganaut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Supply
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a regulated dual supply using the uA78L05 for an opamp array intended for a research project. Participants explore the necessary specifications, component substitutions, and considerations for voltage and current requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about substituting uA78L15 and uA79L15 with uA78L05 and uA79L05 for a +/- 5V supply, questioning if capacitor values need adjustment.
  • Another participant confirms the substitution is correct and suggests reducing input voltages to +/-8V to manage power dissipation in the regulators.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of keeping input voltage within specified ranges, with recommendations to avoid exceeding certain limits to prevent excessive heat generation.
  • There is a discussion about the criticality of capacitor values, with one participant noting that they may not be crucial, while another mentions the need for decoupling capacitors for stability and transient response.
  • A participant shares their current requirements for the opamps, indicating they are using 128 opamps with a typical current draw of 1.4mA each, suggesting that current rating should not be an issue.
  • Concerns are raised about the battery voltage, with a participant noting that the voltage may drop below operational levels as the battery discharges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the substitution of voltage regulators and the importance of managing input voltage levels. However, there are varying opinions on the criticality of capacitor values and the specifics of decoupling requirements, indicating some unresolved aspects of the design.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to check the current requirements of the opamps and the potential impact of battery voltage on performance. There are references to datasheet specifications for the regulators and capacitors, but no consensus on the necessity of specific capacitor values.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals involved in electronics design, particularly those working on power supply circuits for opamp applications or similar projects requiring voltage regulation.

gaganaut
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am trying to build an opamp array to amplify some voltages simultaneously. The amplification part has been designed. But now I am trying to design a Regulated Dual Supply for all the opamps.

I found this circuit diagram in the Texas Instruments datasheet for uA78L05. This diagram shows an elaborate circuit, but this is for +/- 15V supply. I need a +/- 5V supply.

So can we just substitute the uA78L15 and uA79L15 with their 5V counterparts uA78L05 and uA79L05? Also will the capacitor in this circuit be retained or they need to be changed too?

I need to this for a research project and I have no Elec. background :(
I hope you peeps will be helpful as always.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 15V regulated supply.JPG
    15V regulated supply.JPG
    16.4 KB · Views: 506
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, that would be the correct substitution. You can also reduce the input voltages down to +/-8V or so if you want. Be sure to calculate the power dissipation in the regulators, to see if you will need heat sinks or larger physical packages.
 
Try to keep the input voltage in the range defined in the specs. For example for x05 it is 7...20 V and with x15 17,5...30 V.
 
the capacitor values are probably not that critical. i don't ever remember seeing a justification for the values chosen. i would definitely bring that input voltage down as suggested above, because otherwise, those regulators will be big heat radiators. i wouldn't get too close to the spec, though. berkeman's suggestion of 8 is probably good, but no more than 10.

and don't forget to check the current requirements of all your op amps to be sure your regulators and power source can handle it.
 
berkeman said:
Yes, that would be the correct substitution. You can also reduce the input voltages down to +/-8V or so if you want. Be sure to calculate the power dissipation in the regulators, to see if you will need heat sinks or larger physical packages.

Thanks Berkeman. That was helpful. I am planning to use a 7.4V LiPo for powering up. So that fits perfectly to your suggestion.


misgfool said:
Try to keep the input voltage in the range defined in the specs. For example for x05 it is 7...20 V and with x15 17,5...30 V.

Thanks Misgfool. The input range for the regulators, as you pointed out, is 7-20V for uA78L05. I am going to use a 7.4V LiPo, so it will be well within limits.

Proton Soup said:
the capacitor values are probably not that critical. i don't ever remember seeing a justification for the values chosen. i would definitely bring that input voltage down as suggested above, because otherwise, those regulators will be big heat radiators. i wouldn't get too close to the spec, though. berkeman's suggestion of 8 is probably good, but no more than 10.

and don't forget to check the current requirements of all your op amps to be sure your regulators and power source can handle it.

Thanks Proton Soup. I could not find the explanation for the capacitors as well. Practically speaking, as you say, they should not make any difference as they will do their charging-discharging business in any case. But a quick corroboration from you was helpful.

With regards to the current rating of the op amps, each takes in 1.4mA typ. But I am using 128 of them, 64 for amplification and 64 for filtering. So that way current rating should not be a problem. I just need to change the fan-out now to be sure of being able to do this.

Thanks all for your help.
 
gaganaut said:
Thanks Proton Soup. I could not find the explanation for the capacitors as well. Practically speaking, as you say, they should not make any difference as they will do their charging-discharging business in any case.

The caps will be mentioned in the voltage regulator datasheets. Some regulators require some minimum amount of output capacitance in order to guarantee stability (Low-Dropout LDO regulators typically have a minimum output C requirement). The jellybean regulators that you are talking about using don't have this requirement, but I believe the datasheet says something about the 0.1uF caps (or larger) helping transient response or something similar.

You should be sure to decouple each opamp's power pins to ground at each IC, and add a few bulk electrolytic caps sprinkled around the assembly.

BTW, when you mention a 7.4V power supply, you mean +/-7.4V, right? Why such an unusual number?
 
berkeman said:
The caps will be mentioned in the voltage regulator datasheets. Some regulators require some minimum amount of output capacitance in order to guarantee stability (Low-Dropout LDO regulators typically have a minimum output C requirement). The jellybean regulators that you are talking about using don't have this requirement, but I believe the datasheet says something about the 0.1uF caps (or larger) helping transient response or something similar.

You should be sure to decouple each opamp's power pins to ground at each IC, and add a few bulk electrolytic caps sprinkled around the assembly.

BTW, when you mention a 7.4V power supply, you mean +/-7.4V, right? Why such an unusual number?

Actually, I did find some information about decoupling caps in the datasheet. They need to be 0.1uF.

Regarding the battery, I have a =/1 7.4V battery and it was picked up off the shelf. Actually, one of my labmates ordered 4 of these and I an planning to just use these to save some moolah.

Thanks
 
batteries should be great in the sense that power supply noise is low and you can keep things isolated. but keep an eye on that battery voltage as they discharge. the datasheet is recommending 7V and at 6.7V it may fail to operate correctly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K