Destination for "Passenger" ships?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noisy Rhysling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ships
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the movie "Passengers," focusing on the star system destination of the ship, Homestead II, which is not explicitly named in the film. Participants calculate that if the ship travels at 0.5C for 120 years, it would be approximately 60 light years from Earth. Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of one character waking another from stasis for companionship, with critics labeling it as a selfish act. The conversation also touches on the film's portrayal of loneliness and the challenges of long-duration space travel, including the feasibility of sending help messages back to Earth. Overall, the film is described as visually impressive and engaging, despite its "soft" science fiction elements.
Noisy Rhysling
Messages
999
Reaction score
345
Just wondering if anybody had a clue as to candidate stars for the ship, Homestead II, in this movie.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I saw the movie and loved it but can't remember if they ever specifically name the star system they're going to. I'm pretty sure they didn't bother. However I did a quick calculation in my head when Chris Pratt sends a message back to Earth (and is informed by the console that at the speed of light it will take a few decades to get a reply) and IIRC they were traveling at 0.5C. It was a 120 year journey so where ever they were going was ~60 light years away from Earth.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
I saw the movie and loved it but can't remember if they ever specifically name the star system they're going to. I'm pretty sure they didn't bother. However I did a quick calculation in my head when Chris Pratt sends a message back to Earth (and is informed by the console that at the speed of light it will take a few decades to get a reply) and IIRC they were traveling at 0.5C. It was a 120 year journey so where ever they were going was ~60 light years away from Earth.
The fuzzy part would be how quickly they got to .5 C?
 
Another question would be "How much do tickets cost?" That's a big ship...
 
I also saw the movie, and while it was interesting, I doubt they seriously thought through all the details. This was definitely "soft" science fiction.

How the hell can you just gamble on the stasis pods not malfunctioning?

If each trip takes 100+ years, then how frequently do they send such ships out? I forget how many passengers were being carried - was it ~5000? That seems small for a colony 60 light years away.

How would you convince anyone to go out there when it takes decades to even get a help message back to Earth? It's like a suicide mission.

This movie definitely reminded me of Starlost by Harlan Ellison and Ben Bova

 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
But it sure were pretty!
 
Ryan_m_b said:
I saw the movie and loved it

I missed this when it came out (short half life?). I just read some reviews & apparently a lot of critics were turned off by the man waking up the woman just for company, saying it was a grossly selfish act, akin to violation or stalking. One critic seemed to think it was at least believable, given the guy was going crazy with loneliness on board a huge ship on a very long voyage. I'm a huge fan of spaceship movies; would you recommend renting this when it becomes available? I should add that personally I don't like misogynistic characters as such.
 
UsableThought said:
I missed this when it came out (short half life?). I just read some reviews & apparently a lot of critics were turned off by the man waking up the woman just for company, saying it was a grossly selfish act, akin to violation or stalking. One critic seemed to think it was at least believable. I'm a huge fan of spaceship movies; would you recommend renting this when it becomes available?
Well, the thing is that if the roles had been gender-swapped, then it wouldn't have come across as the creepy male stalker thing.

Lawrence Fishburne's character put it in perspective, when he said that a drowning man will try to pull another swimmer down with him - it's not ethical, but that's what he'll try to do.
 
sanman said:
Lawrence Fishburne's character put it in perspective,

Lawrence Fishburne is in this?! Then I have to rent it when it comes time. He is becoming the king of offbeat spaceship movies by now - he was captain of the Nebuchadnezzar in "The Matrix" (well OK that ship was a hovercraft, but it looked like a spaceship); captain of the doomed Lewis & Clarke rescue ship in "Event Horizon"; and now he's, well, he's Chief Deck Officer on the Avalon. Anytime you have a flimsily plotted space movie, just add Fishburne for some badly needed gravitas.
 
  • Like
Likes krater
  • #10
UsableThought said:
I missed this when it came out (short half life?). I just read some reviews & apparently a lot of critics were turned off by the man waking up the woman just for company, saying it was a grossly selfish act, akin to violation or stalking. One critic seemed to think it was at least believable, given the guy was going crazy with loneliness on board a huge ship on a very long voyage. I'm a huge fan of spaceship movies; would you recommend renting this when it becomes available? I should add that personally I don't like misogynistic characters as such.
We saw it yesterday in the theaters.
 
  • #11
Noisy Rhysling said:
We saw it yesterday in the theaters.

Thanks. I thought a Dec. release date might have meant it was done already. I see it listed near us, alongside Monster Trucks and the latest Underworld.

I also see Hidden Figures is showing; and right now that sounds like the most appealing space-related movie out. We'll probably see that first. And hey it's about mathematicians!
 
  • #12
UsableThought said:
I missed this when it came out (short half life?). I just read some reviews & apparently a lot of critics were turned off by the man waking up the woman just for company, saying it was a grossly selfish act, akin to violation or stalking. One critic seemed to think it was at least believable, given the guy was going crazy with loneliness on board a huge ship on a very long voyage. I'm a huge fan of spaceship movies; would you recommend renting this when it becomes available? I should add that personally I don't like misogynistic characters as such.

I didn't get any sort of misogynist vibe from it. It's much more of a castaway story IMO. I would definitely advise seeing it, one of the best SF films that came out last year. It was tight, very visually impressive and a good all round story. It didn't spend too much time or effort trying to justify things it didn't need to and the acting was spot on.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
2001, The Shining plus Titanic with a happy ending, done very well.
 
  • Like
Likes Ryan_m_b
  • #14
UsableThought said:
I missed this when it came out (short half life?). I just read some reviews & apparently a lot of critics were turned off by the man waking up the woman just for company, saying it was a grossly selfish act, akin to violation or stalking. One critic seemed to think it was at least believable, given the guy was going crazy with loneliness on board a huge ship on a very long voyage. I'm a huge fan of spaceship movies; would you recommend renting this when it becomes available? I should add that personally I don't like misogynistic characters as such.
Lonely person becomes obsessed with not being alone. Not so very strange.
 
  • Like
Likes Hilmy atha and Logical Dog
  • #15
Ryan_m_b said:
I saw the movie and loved it but can't remember if they ever specifically name the star system they're going to. I'm pretty sure they didn't bother. However I did a quick calculation in my head when Chris Pratt sends a message back to Earth (and is informed by the console that at the speed of light it will take a few decades to get a reply) and IIRC they were traveling at 0.5C. It was a 120 year journey so where ever they were going was ~60 light years away from Earth.
Well, not quite. if it is a 120 year long trip by ship time at 0.5c, then relativistic effects become significant and the distance to the star as measured from the Earth would be ~69.3 light years.
By the plot line, they awake 90 years too soon, so this should place them ~15 light years from Earth (by their measure). If he sends a message to Earth at c, in his frame, Earth is receding at .05 c, and it will take the message 30 years to "catch up" to it, meaning it will be 30 light years away when it gets the message. Plus another 30 years for the return message makes for 60 years for an answer. Used right, this could have set up an interesting situation. Let's say that they had woken up 80 years too early. Then the return message would have taken 80 years to get back to them, the same length of time as the remaining trip. So if they awoke just a bit after 40 years into the trip, any answer wouldn't arrive until after they reached their destination.
 
  • #16
sanman said:
This movie definitely reminded me of Starlost by Harlan Ellison and Ben Bova

Except that Passengers is a sleeper ship, while Starlost used the trope of a generation ship, right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
564
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top