Destructive Interference and path difference

Click For Summary
In the discussion on destructive interference of waves, the confusion revolves around the correct usage of path difference equations, specifically PD=(m+1/2)lambda versus PD=(m-1/2)lambda. The key point is that for double slit interference, destructive interference occurs at path differences that are odd multiples of half the wavelength, such as 1/2, 3/2, etc. Thus, the equation PD=(m-1/2)lambda is appropriate for calculating the path difference for dark fringes, where m indicates the number of the dark fringe from the central maximum. Understanding this distinction helps clarify the pattern of dark spots in the interference pattern. Accurate application of these equations is essential for analyzing wave interference phenomena.
wendo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I hope I'm posting in the right place!

In the destructive interference of waves and solving for the path difference, I"m confused at when we should use m+1/2 vs. m-1/2 ( so the eq'n is PD=(m+1/2)lambda or PD=(m-1/2) lambda

Any insight would be greatly appreciated! :)

thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
m is a number of how many dark spots away you are from the center. The sign determines which direction on the interference pattern from the center is your dark spot.
 
wendo said:
In the destructive interference of waves and solving for the path difference, I"m confused at when we should use m+1/2 vs. m-1/2 ( so the eq'n is PD=(m+1/2)lambda or PD=(m-1/2) lambda
If you're talking about double slit interference, then destructive interference (dark fringes) happen when the path difference is a 1/2, 3/2, 5/2, etc., multiple of the wavelength. So you can use PD=(m-1/2)lambda, where m stands for the number of the dark fringe (m = 1, 2, 3, etc.; first, second, third, etc., dark fringe) counting from the central maximum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K